Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28950957›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in psychology2017

Ideal affect in daily life: implications for affective experience, health, and social behavior.

Jeanne L Tsai

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in psychology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jeanne L TsaiDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. Electronic address: jeanne.tsai@stanford.edu.

Funding

Pilot CoreP30AG024957 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GARBER, ALAN MICHAEL · 2004 to 2013
$3.6M
Cultural Variation in Affect ValuationR01MH068879 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI TSAI, JEANNE L · 2005 to 2007
$1.0M
Culture, Age and Affect ValuationR03AG023302 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI TSAI, JEANNE L · 2004 to 2005
$144k
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG024957NIA NIH HHS R03 AG023302NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH068879
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last decade, researchers have increasingly demonstrated that ideal affect-the affective states that people value and ideally want to feel-shapes different aspects of daily life. Here I briefly review Affect Valuation Theory (AVT), which integrates ideal affect into existing models of affect and emotion by identifying the causes and consequences of variation in ideal affect. I then describe recent research that applies AVT to the valuation of negative states as well as more complex states, examines how ideal affect shapes momentary affective experience, suggests that ideal affect has both direct and indirect effects on health, and illustrates that people's ideal affect shapes how they judge and respond to others. Finally, I discuss the implications of cultural and individual differences in ideal affect for clinical, educational, work, and leisure settings.

Indexed as

AffectHealth StatusSocial BehaviorBrainCultureHumansModels, PsychologicalSelf Concept

Identifiers

PMID28950957
PMCPMC5659332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.