Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28950955›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in psychology2017

Interoceptive contributions to healthy eating and obesity.

W Kyle Simmons, Danielle C DeVille

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in psychology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

W Kyle SimmonsLaureate Institute for Brain Research, 6655 South Yale Ave., Tulsa, OK 74136-3326, United States; School of Community Medicine, University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, United States. Electronic address: wksimmons@laureateinstitute.org.
Danielle C DeVilleLaureate Institute for Brain Research, 6655 South Yale Ave., Tulsa, OK 74136-3326, United States; Department of Psychology, University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, United States.
Laureate Institute for Brain Research · USUniversity of Tulsa · US

Funding

The Neural Bases of Pathological Food Perception and Choice in Major DepressionK01MH096175 · NIMH · LAUREATE INSTITUTE FOR BRAIN RESEARCH · PI SIMMONS, WILLIAM KYLE · 2012 to 2016
$904k
NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH096175
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obesity results from persistent failure by the brain to balance food intake with energy needs, resulting in a state of chronic energy surplus. Although there are many factors that predispose individuals to weight gain and obesity, the current review focuses on two ways eating behavior may be influenced by sensitivity to interoceptive signals of hunger, satiety, and metabolic energy reserves. First, obesity may be related to hypersensitivity to interoceptive signals of hunger, leading to positive alliesthesia for food cues that undermine attempts to change unhealthy eating behaviors. Second, overeating and obesity may arise from an inability to accurately detect interoceptive signals of satiety and positive energy balance. The findings reviewed herein demonstrate that obesity may be related to altered interoception, and warrant the continued development of novel obesity interventions aimed at promoting interoceptive awareness.

Indexed as

InteroceptionBrainEatingFeeding BehaviorHealth BehaviorHumansObesity

Identifiers

PMID28950955
PMCPMC5657601
OpenAlexW2725908365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.