Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28950897›Full record

Observational studyCritical care (London, England)2017

Blind bedside postpyloric placement of spiral tube as rescue therapy in critically ill patients: a prospective, tricentric, observational study.

Bo Lv, Linhui Hu, Lifang Chen, Bei Hu, Yanlin Zhang, Heng Ye, Cheng Sun, Xiunong Zhang, Huilan Lan, Chunbo Chen

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Critical care (London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Is metoclopramide beneficial for the postpyloric placement of nasoenteric tubes? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Comparison between the NUTRIC score and modified NUTRIC score to predict hospital mortality in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: A retrospective study.Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2026
    Article
  7. Application of a downward tract adherence method in the manual bedside placement of post-pyloric tubes in the intensive care unit.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bo LvDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, 106 Zhongshan Er Road, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China.
Linhui HuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, 106 Zhongshan Er Road, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China.
Lifang ChenDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, 106 Zhongshan Er Road, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China.
Bei HuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, 106 Zhongshan Er Road, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China.
Yanlin ZhangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Xinjiang Kashgar Region's First People's Hospital, 66 Airport Road, Kashgar Region, 844099, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, People's Republic of China.
Heng YeDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Guangzhou Nansha Central Hospital, 105 Fengzhedong Road, Guangzhou, 511457, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China.
Cheng SunDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, 106 Zhongshan Er Road, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China.
Xiunong ZhangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, 106 Zhongshan Er Road, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China.
Huilan LanDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, 106 Zhongshan Er Road, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China.
Chunbo ChenDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, 106 Zhongshan Er Road, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China. gghccm@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5662-497X
Guangdong General Hospital · CNPeople's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVarious special techniques for blind bedside transpyloric tube placement have been introduced into clinical practice. However, transpyloric spiral tube placement facilitated by a blind bedside method has not yet been reported. The objective of this prospective study was to evaluate the safety and efficiency of blind bedside postpyloric placement of a spiral tube as a rescue therapy subsequent to failed spontaneous transpyloric migration in critically ill patients.

methodsThis prospective, tricentric, observational study was conducted in the intensive care units (ICUs) of three tertiary hospitals. A total of 127 consecutive patients with failed spontaneous transpyloric spiral tube migration despite using prokinetic agents and still required enteral nutrition for more than 3 days were included. The spiral tube was inserted postpylorically using the blind bedside technique. All patients received metoclopramide intravenously prior to tube insertion. The exact tube tip position was determined by radiography. The primary efficacy endpoint was the success rate of postpyloric spiral tube placement. Secondary efficacy endpoints were success rate of a spiral tube placed in the third portion of the duodenum (D3) or beyond, success rate of placement in the proximal jejunum, time to insertion, length of insertion, and number of attempts. Safety endpoints were metoclopramide-related and major adverse tube-associated events.

resultsIn 81.9% of patients, the spiral feeding tubes were placed postpylorically; of these, 55.1% were placed in D3 or beyond and 33.9% were placed in the proximal jejunum, with a median time to insertion of 14 min and an average number of attempts of 1.4. The mean length of insertion was 95.6 cm. The adverse event incidence was 26.0%, and no serious adverse event was observed.

conclusionsBlind bedside postpyloric placement of a spiral tube, as a rescue therapy subsequent to failed spontaneous transpyloric migration in critically ill patients, is safe and effective. This technique may facilitate the early initiation of postpyloric feeding in the ICU.

trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR-OPN-16008206 . Registered on 1 April 2016.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessIntubation, GastrointestinalPyloric AntrumAgedAntiemeticsEnteral NutritionFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMetoclopramideMiddle AgedProspective StudiesAntiemeticsMetoclopramideBlind bedsideCritically ill patientsEnteral nutritionPostpyloric placementRescue therapySpiral nasojejunal tube

Identifiers

PMID28950897
PMCPMC5615440
OpenAlexW2757549812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.