Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28950896›Full record

Observational studyArthritis research & therapy2017

Patient-provider discordance between global assessments of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis: a comprehensive clinical evaluation.

Divya N Challa, Zoran Kvrgic, Andrea L Cheville, Cynthia S Crowson, Tim Bongartz, Thomas G Mason, Eric L Matteson, Clement J Michet, Scott T Persellin, Daniel E Schaffer and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Arthritis research & therapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Pain: A Review of Interleukin-6 and Its Roles in the Pain of Rheumatoid Arthritis.Open access rheumatology : research and reviews · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Divya N ChallaDivision of Rheumatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Zoran KvrgicDivision of Rheumatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Andrea L ChevilleDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Cynthia S CrowsonDivision of Biostatistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Tim BongartzDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Thomas G MasonDivision of Rheumatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Eric L MattesonDivision of Rheumatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Clement J MichetDivision of Rheumatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Scott T PersellinDivision of Rheumatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Daniel E SchafferDivision of Rheumatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Theresa L Wampler MuskardinDivision of Rheumatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Kerry WrightDivision of Rheumatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
John M DavisDivision of Rheumatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. davis.john4@mayo.edu.
Mayo Clinic · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

Mayo Clinic Center for Translational Science ActivitiesUL1TR000135 · NCATS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KHOSLA, SUNDEEP · 2012 to 2015
$41.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000135
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiscordance between patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and their rheumatology health care providers is a common and important problem. The objective of this study was to perform a comprehensive clinical evaluation of patient-provider discordance in RA.

methodsA cross-sectional observational study was conducted of consecutive RA patients in a regional practice with an absolute difference of ≥ 25 points between patient and provider global assessments (possible points, 0-100). Data were collected for disease activity measures, clinical characteristics, comorbidities, and medications. In a prospective substudy, participants completed patient-reported outcome measures and underwent ultrasonographic assessment of synovial inflammation. Differences between the discordant and concordant groups were tested using χ

resultsPatient-provider discordance affected 114 (32.5%) of 350 consecutive patients. Of the total population, 103 patients (29.5%) rated disease activity higher than their providers (i.e., 'positive' discordance); only 11 (3.1%) rated disease activity lower than their providers and were excluded from further analysis. Positive discordance correlated with negative rheumatoid factor and anticyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies, lack of joint erosions, presence of comorbid fibromyalgia or depression, and use of opioids, antidepressants, or anxiolytics, or fibromyalgia medications. In the prospective study, the group with positive discordance was distinguished by higher pain intensity, neuropathic type pain, chronic widespread pain and associated polysymptomatic distress, and limited functional health status. Depression was found to be an important mediator of positive discordance in low disease activity whereas the widespread pain index was an important mediator of positive discordance in moderate-to-high disease activity states. Ultrasonography scores did not reveal significant differences in synovial inflammation between discordant and concordant groups.

conclusionsThe findings provide a deeper understanding of patient-provider discordance than previously known. New insights from this study include the evidence that positive discordance is not associated with unrecognized joint inflammation by ultrasonography and that depression and fibromyalgia appear to play distinct roles in determining positive discordance. Further work is necessary to develop a comprehensive framework for patient-centered evaluation and management of RA and associated comorbidities in patients in the scenario of patient-provider discordance.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresPhysiciansAdultArthritis, RheumatoidCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth StatusHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexDepressionDisease activityFibromyalgiaPatient-reported outcomesRheumatoid arthritis

Identifiers

PMID28950896
PMCPMC5615447
OpenAlexW2757370554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.