Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28950828›Full record

ReviewCurrent pharmaceutical design2017

Collaboration in Regulatory Science to Facilitate Therapeutic Development for Neonates.

Susan K McCune, Yeruk Ager Mulugeta, Gerri R Baer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current pharmaceutical design, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Susan K McCuneOffice of Pediatric Therapeutics, Office of the Commissioner, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, United States.
Yeruk Ager MulugetaDivision of Pediatric and Maternal Health, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, United States.
Gerri R BaerOffice of Pediatric Therapeutics, Office of the Commissioner, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, United States.

Funding

Intramural FDA HHS FD999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHistorically, neonatal therapeutic interventions were derived from adult therapeutics, and tragedies resulting from this approach have demonstrated differences in the pathophysiologic and developmental processes between neonates and older patients. Over the past 3 decades, researchers and collaborative research networks have made progress in the systematic evaluation of neonatal therapies, yet most neonatal therapeutic products have been incompletely assessed for safety and efficacy, and remain unlabeled and unapproved. APPROACH: This work describes the legislative initiatives that have stimulated an increase in pediatric and neonatal studies. It highlights examples of successful neonatal drug studies that have resulted in informative neonatal labeling changes, as well as studies that have produced incomplete information. Strategies that support the design of successful studies, including targeting specific subpopulations, modeling and simulation to inform dose selection, innovative design strategies, biomarkers, and endpoints are discussed. Multi-stakeholder consortia such as the International Neonatal Consortium (INC), are working to improve the tools needed for the development of neonatal therapies. These research tools may be used by trial networks to inform consistent and efficient multicenter studies.

conclusionMore data are needed to support safe and effective use of drugs in neonates, and to obtain these data, a thorough understanding of pathophysiology, drug disposition, biomarkers, and clinically-meaningful endpoints is required. This information will be derived from clinical trials, registries, real-world evidence, and the medical literature. Collaboration of consortia and the development of research networks are essential to achieving these goals.

Indexed as

Intersectoral CollaborationLegislation, DrugChild DevelopmentClinical Trials as TopicHumansInfant, NewbornPharmaceutical PreparationsUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationPharmaceutical Preparationsconsortiadrug labelinnovative trial designregulatory scienceresearch networks.Suggested keywords are neonate

Identifiers

PMID28950828
PMCPMC5837929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.