Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28950783›Full record

Trial reportVascular2017

Safety and effectiveness of the Phoenix Atherectomy System in lower extremity arteries: Early and midterm outcomes from the prospective multicenter EASE study.

Thomas Davis, Venkatesh Ramaiah, Khusrow Niazi, Hans Martin Gissler, Tami Crabtree

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Vascular, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01541774 (A Prospective, Multicenter Clinical Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of the Phoenix Atherectomy™ System in Atherectomy of the Peripheral Vasculature), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01541774 phase3completednot on this map

A Prospective, Multicenter Clinical Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of the Phoenix Atherectomy™ System in Atherectomy of the Peripheral Vasculature

TypeinterventionalSponsorAtheroMed, IncRan2010 to 2013Enrolled128ConditionsPeripheral Vascular DiseaseArmsPhoenix Atherectomy System
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Enrollment of Historically Underrepresented Groups in Peripheral Arterial Disease Trials: A Systematic Review.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Phoenix atherectomy for patients with peripheral artery disease.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Comparison of long-term outcomes after directional versus rotational atherectomy in peripheral artery disease.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2020
    Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Thomas Davis1 Interventional Cardiology, St. John Hospital and Medical Center, Detroit, MI, USA.
Venkatesh Ramaiah2 Department of Vascular Surgery, Arizona Heart Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Khusrow Niazi3 Peripheral Vascular Intervention, 1371 Emory University, Emory Heart and Vascular, 1371 Emory University , Atlanta, GA, USA.
Hans Martin Gissler4 Department of Interventional Radiology, Kantonspital, Aarau, Switzerland.
Tami Crabtree5 Independent biostatistician, Santa Rosa, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives To evaluate the novel Phoenix Atherectomy System as percutaneous treatment of de novo and restenotic infrainguinal arterial lesions. Methods This prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized investigational device exemption trial was conducted across 16 US and German centers between August 2010 and April 2013. Intention-to-treat enrollment was 128 patients (mean age: 71.8 years, 59% male) with 149 lesions (mean length: 34 mm, mean diameter stenosis: 89.5%), and the primary analysis per-protocol population consisted of 105 patients with 123 lesions. The primary efficacy endpoint, technical success, was the achievement of acute debulking with a post-atherectomy residual diameter stenosis ≤50% (before adjunctive therapy). The primary safety endpoint was the major adverse event (MAE) rate through 30 days. Results For the primary analysis per-protocol population, the rate of lesion technical success was 95.1% (117/123), with the lower limit of the 95% CI 90.6%, meeting the prospectively established target performance goal of ≥86%. After post-atherectomy adjunctive therapy, residual stenosis was ≤30% for 99.2% (122/123) of lesions (mean final diameter stenosis 10.5%). Improvement of ≥1 Rutherford class occurred for 74.5% of patients through 30 days and for 80% through six months. MAEs were experienced by 5.7% (6/105) of patients through 30 days (with the upper limit of the 95% CI 11.0%, meeting the target performance goal of <20%), and 16.8% through six months. Six-month freedom from TLR and TVR was 88.0% and 86.1%, respectively. Conclusions Based on the high rate of technical success and the low rates of MAEs through six months, the Phoenix Atherectomy System is safe and effective for the debulking of lower-extremity arterial lesions. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01541774.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAtherectomyConstriction, PathologicEquipment DesignFemaleGermanyHumansLower ExtremityMaleMiddle AgedPeripheral Arterial DiseaseProspective StudiesRecurrenceTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAtherectomydistal embolizationinfrainguinal arteriesperipheral arterial diseaserevascularizationstenosis

Identifiers

PMID28950783
PMCPMC5714160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.