ReviewExperimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.)2018
Biomarkers of adverse drug reactions.
Review in Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Introduction to Pharmacogenomics: Role of the Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory in Personalised Medicine-Current Status and Future Prospects.International journal of immunogenetics · 2026Review
- Real-world performance of the machine learning-based prediction of chemotherapy-associated adverse effects in lung cancer.Oncology letters · 2026Article
- Cancer Immunotherapies: Navigating the Immune Landscape.Current cancer drug targets · 2026Review
- Comparison of Azathioprine-Induced Pancreatitis and Gastrointestinal Intolerance in IBD: Role of Demographics, Clinical Variables, and HLA DQA1/DRB1 Alleles.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Advancing drug safety in psychiatry: insights from pharmacogenomics of hypersensitivity reactions.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Development and validation of a risk-prediction model for adverse drug reactions in real-world cancer patients treated with anlotinib.Therapeutic advances in drug safety · 2025Article
- Leukocytes telomere length as a biomarker of adverse drug reactions induced by Osimertinib in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Drug hypersensitivity reactions: review of the state of the science for prediction and diagnosis.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2024Review
- The Assessment of Meloxicam Phototoxicity in Human Normal Skin Cells: In Vitro Studies on Dermal Fibroblasts and Epidermal Melanocytes.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- HLA variants associated with azathioprine-induced pancreatitis in patients with Crohn's disease.Clinical and translational science · 2022Article
- Drug-Induced Photosensitivity-From Light and Chemistry to Biological Reactions and Clinical Symptoms.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Ibuprofen induced Stevens-Johnson syndrome and liver injury in children: a case report.Translational pediatrics · 2021Article
- Molecular and Biochemical Basis of Minocycline-Induced Hyperpigmentation-The Study on Normal Human Melanocytes Exposed to UVA and UVB Radiation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Liquid biopsy in cancer using the Z-scan technique: a new approach to discover biomarkers in cancer.Future science OA · 2020Review
- Immunotherapy for ANCA-associated vasculitis during the COVID-19 pandemic.European journal of rheumatology · 2020Article
- Adverse Drug Reaction Discovery Using a Tumor-Biomarker Knowledge Graph.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- Future Directions of Pharmacovigilance Studies Using Electronic Medical Recording and Human Genetic Databases.Toxicological research · 2019Review
- Germline variants in cancer therapy.Cancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2019Review
- Biotherapeutics: Challenges and Opportunities for Predictive Toxicology of Monoclonal Antibodies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018Review
- Pharmacogenomics of Medications Commonly Used in the Intensive Care Unit.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Adverse drug reactions can be caused by a wide range of therapeutics. Adverse drug reactions affect many bodily organ systems and vary widely in severity. Milder adverse drug reactions often resolve quickly following withdrawal of the casual drug or sometimes after dose reduction. Some adverse drug reactions are severe and lead to significant organ/tissue injury which can be fatal. Adverse drug reactions also represent a financial burden to both healthcare providers and the pharmaceutical industry. Thus, a number of stakeholders would benefit from development of new, robust biomarkers for the prediction, diagnosis, and prognostication of adverse drug reactions. There has been significant recent progress in identifying predictive genomic biomarkers with the potential to be used in clinical settings to reduce the burden of adverse drug reactions. These have included biomarkers that can be used to alter drug dose (for example, Thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) and azathioprine dose) and drug choice. The latter have in particular included human leukocyte antigen (HLA) biomarkers which identify susceptibility to immune-mediated injuries to major organs such as skin, liver, and bone marrow from a variety of drugs. This review covers both the current state of the art with regard to genomic adverse drug reaction biomarkers. We also review circulating biomarkers that have the potential to be used for both diagnosis and prognosis, and have the added advantage of providing mechanistic information. In the future, we will not be relying on single biomarkers (genomic/non-genomic), but on multiple biomarker panels, integrated through the application of different omics technologies, which will provide information on predisposition, early diagnosis, prognosis, and mechanisms. Impact statement • Genetic and circulating biomarkers present significant opportunities to personalize patient therapy to minimize the risk of adverse drug reactions. ADRs are a significant heath issue and represent a significant burden to patients, healthcare providers, and the pharmaceutical industry. • This review details the current state of the art in biomarkers of ADRs (both genetic and circulating). There is still significant variability in patient response which cannot be explained by current knowledge of genetic risk factors for ADRs; however, we discussed how specific advances in genomics have the potential to yield better and more predictive models. • Many current clinically utilized circulating biomarkers of tissue injury are valid biomarkers for a number of ADRs. However, they often give little insight into the specific cell or tissue subtype which may be affected. Emerging circulating biomarkers with potential to provide greater information on the etiology/pathophysiology of ADRs are described.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.