Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28950719›Full record

Trial reportClinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis2018

Evaluation of Thromboelastometry in Sepsis in Correlation With Bleeding During Invasive Procedures.

Pavel Lukas, Miroslav Durila, Jakub Jonas, Tomas Vymazal

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02971111 (Evaluation of Thromboelastometry in Sepsis in Correlation to Bleeding During Invasive Procedures), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02971111 completednot on this map

Evaluation of Thromboelastometry in Sepsis in Correlation to Bleeding During Invasive Procedures

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospital, MotolRan2013 to 2016Enrolled76ConditionsThrombelastography, Sepsis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Bleeding Risk of Central Venous Catheterization in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.TH open : companion journal to thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pavel Lukas1 Second Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charles University, Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic, Europe.
Miroslav Durila1 Second Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charles University, Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic, Europe.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9515-8235
Jakub Jonas1 Second Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charles University, Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic, Europe.
Tomas Vymazal1 Second Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charles University, Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic, Europe.
Charles University · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prolongation of prothrombin time (PT) is often encountered in patients with sepsis. On the other hand, thromboelastometry as a global coagulation test might yield normal results. The aim of our study was to evaluate whether prolonged PT in the presence of normal thromboelastometry parameters is associated with severe bleeding in patients with sepsis undergoing invasive procedures. In patients with sepsis undergoing low-risk bleeding invasive procedures (central venous catheter placement, dialysis catheter insertion, drain insertion, and so on) or high-risk bleeding invasive procedures (surgical tracheostomy, surgical laparotomy, thoracotomy, and so on), coagulation was assessed by thromboelastometry using EXTEM test (test for evaluation of the extrinsic pathway of coagulation, contains activator of extrinsic pathway) and with PT. For period of years 2013 to 2016, we assessed occurrence of severe bleeding during those procedures and 24 hours later in patients with prolonged PT and normal thromboelastometry results. This retrospective study was performed at Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine of Motol University Hospital in Prague. Data from 76 patients with sepsis were analyzed. Median value of international normalized ratio (INR) was 1.59 (min-1.3 and max-2.56), and median value of prothrombin ratio (PR) was 1.5 (min-1.23 and max-2.55) with normal thromboelastometry finding. Despite prolonged INR/PR, no severe bleeding was observed during invasive procedures. Our data show that sepsis may be accompanied by normal thromboelastometry results, despite prolonged values of PT, and invasive procedures were performed without severe bleeding. This approach to coagulation assessment in sepsis may reduce administration of fresh frozen plasma to the patients. The study was registered at Clinical Trials.gov with assigned number NCT02971111.

Indexed as

Blood Loss, SurgicalInternational Normalized RatioThrombelastographyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsSepsisEXTEMinvasive procedureprothrombin timesepsisthromboelastometry

Identifiers

PMID28950719
PMCPMC6714732
OpenAlexW2758977922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.