Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28950697›Full record

ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2017

Perceived Barriers to Breast Cancer Screening among Saudi Women at Primary Care Setting

Shaimaa Baher Abdel-Aziz, Tarek Tawfik Amin, Mohammed Baqir Al-Gadeeb, Abdullah I Alhassar, Ali Al-Ramadan, Mohammed Al-Helal, Mohammad Bu-Mejdad, Lubna Abdulaziz Al-Hamad, Eman Hussain Alkhalaf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Bangkok declarations on cancer control in Asia.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Factors related to clinical breast examination: A cross-sectional study.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Shaimaa Baher Abdel-AzizPublic Health and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Egypt. Email: Shaimaabaher @yahoo.com
Tarek Tawfik Amin
Mohammed Baqir Al-Gadeeb
Abdullah I Alhassar
Ali Al-Ramadan
Mohammed Al-Helal
Mohammad Bu-Mejdad
Lubna Abdulaziz Al-Hamad
Eman Hussain Alkhalaf

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Screening for breast cancer (BC) is of low rate in Saudi Arabia; although it is provided in the country free of charge to the population. This cross-sectional study aimed at investigating the perceived barriers towards BC screening in Al Hassa, Saudi Arabia. It is crucial for increasing the rate of utilization of screening to identify the possible barriers for seeking BC screening in order to enhance early diagnosis and improve outcome. Materials and Methods: A total of 816 adult Saudi women aged ≥ 30 years attending for routine primary health services or accompanying patients at the selected primary health care centers (PHCs) were randomly selected from 12 PHCs (8 urban and four rural) using multi-stage sampling method. Participants were invited to personal interview using semi-structured data collection instrument including inquiries about socio-demographics, reproductive history, previous histories of diagnosed breast lesions and breast cancer. The perceived individual barriers towards screening, their attitudes, the reasons for not attending previously held screening campaigns in Al Hassa, were also included. Results: Low utilization of BC screening has being significantly associated with woman’s age (OR=2.55; 95% CI= 1.71-3.83), higher educational status (OR=2.98; 95% CI=2.05-4.34), higher family income (OR=1.96; 95% CI=1.31-2.93), using hormonal contraception (OR=1.46; 95% CI=0.99-2.13) and positive history of previous breast (OR=12.16; 95% CI=6.89-21.46), as shown by the results of the logistic regression model. Exploratory factor analysis showed that personal fears (especially fear of doctors/ examiners, fear of hospitals and health facilities and fear of consequences/results) were the major factors that hinder women from utilizing the free of charge BC screening with high loading eigenvalue of 3.335, explaining 30.4% of the barriers. Conclusion: Educational interventions aim at improving breast cancer knowledge and addressing barriers should be incorporated as core component of the screening program in Saudi Arabia.

Indexed as

Breast cancercancer screeningperceived barriersprimary careSaudi Arabia

Identifiers

PMID28950697
PMCPMC5720644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.