Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28950421›Full record

Trial reportArthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.)2018

Phase III Randomized Study of SB5, an Adalimumab Biosimilar, Versus Reference Adalimumab in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Michael E Weinblatt, Asta Baranauskaite, Jaroslaw Niebrzydowski, Eva Dokoupilova, Agnieszka Zielinska, Janusz Jaworski, Artur Racewicz, Margarita Pileckyte, Krystyna Jedrychowicz-Rosiak, Soo Yeon Cheong and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 131 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Michael E WeinblattBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Asta BaranauskaiteLithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Jaroslaw NiebrzydowskiMedica Pro Familia, Gdynia, Poland.
Eva DokoupilovaMedical Plus, Uherske Hradiste, Czech Republic.
Agnieszka ZielinskaMedica Pro Familia, Warsaw, Poland.
Janusz JaworskiReumatika, Centrum Reumatologii, Warsaw, Poland.
Artur RacewiczZdrowie Osteo-Medic, Białystok, Poland.
Margarita PileckyteLithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Krystyna Jedrychowicz-RosiakMazowieckie Centrum Badań Klinicznych, Grodzisk Mazowiecki, Poland.
Soo Yeon CheongSamsung Bioepis, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Jeehoon GhilSamsung Bioepis, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Lithuanian University of Health Sciences · LTSamsung (South Korea) · KRBrigham and Women's Hospital · USMedical Plus · CZMedical University of Białystok · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSB5 is a biosimilar agent for adalimumab (ADA). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and immunogenicity of SB5 in comparison with reference ADA in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

methodsIn this phase III, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study, patients with moderately to severely active RA despite treatment with methotrexate were randomized 1:1 to receive SB5 or reference ADA at a dosage of 40 mg subcutaneously every other week. The primary efficacy end point was the response rate based on the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (ACR20) at week 24 in the per-protocol set (completer analysis). Additional end points included efficacy, PK, safety, and immunogenicity assessments.

resultsOf the 544 patients randomized to receive a study drug, the full analysis set comprised 542 patients (269 in the SB5 group, 273 in the reference ADA group) and the per-protocol set comprised 476 patients (239 receiving SB5, 237 receiving reference ADA). The ACR20 response rate at week 24 in the per-protocol set was equivalent between those receiving SB5 and those receiving reference ADA (72.4% and 72.2%, respectively); the difference in the ACR20 response rate (0.1%, [95% confidence interval -7.83%, 8.13%]) was within the predefined equivalence margin (±15%). Similar results were seen in the full analysis set (missing data being considered a nonresponse). The SB5 and reference ADA treatment groups were comparable across other end points, including the ACR 50% and ACR 70% improvement response rates, Disease Activity Score in 28 joints based on the erythrocyte sedimentation rate, PK data, incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events, and the antidrug antibody response. Subgroup analyses showed that the efficacy and safety of SB5 and reference ADA were comparable regardless of antidrug antibody status.

conclusionThe ACR20 response rate at week 24 was equivalent between patients treated with the biosimilar agent SB5 and those treated with reference ADA. SB5 and reference ADA were both well tolerated, with comparable safety profiles, in patients with RA.

Indexed as

AdalimumabAdolescentAdultAgedAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsDouble-Blind MethodHumansMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAdalimumabAntirheumatic AgentsBiosimilar Pharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID28950421
PMCPMC5765475
OpenAlexW2759307758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.