Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28950268›Full record

Trial reportInternational archives of allergy and immunology2017

The SQ House Dust Mite SLIT-Tablet Is Well Tolerated in Patients with House Dust Mite Respiratory Allergic Disease.

Waltraud Emminger, María Dolores Hernández, Victòria Cardona, Frank Smeenk, Bodil S Fogh, Moises A Calderon, Frederic de Blay, Vibeke Backer

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International archives of allergy and immunology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Sublingual immunotherapy for asthma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Focused allergic rhinitis practice parameter for Canada.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Towards definitive management of allergic rhinitis: best use of new and established therapies.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Allergen Extracts for In Vivo Diagnosis and Treatment of Allergy: Is There a Future?The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Waltraud EmmingerAllergy Outpatient Clinic, Vienna, Austria.
María Dolores Hernández
Victòria Cardona
Frank Smeenk
Bodil S Fogh
Moises A Calderon
Frederic de Blay
Vibeke Backer
ALK-Abelló (Denmark) · DKBispebjerg Hospital · DKInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe · ESRadboud University Nijmegen · NLRoyal Brompton Hospital · GBUniversité de Strasbourg · FRVall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe SQ house dust mite (HDM) SLIT-tablet (ALK, Denmark) addresses the underlying cause of HDM respiratory allergic disease, and a clinical effect has been demonstrated for both HDM allergic rhinitis and allergic asthma. Here, we present pooled safety data from an adult population with HDM respiratory allergy, with particular focus on the impact of asthma on the SQ HDM SLIT-tablet tolerability profile.

methodsSafety data from 2 randomised double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials were included: MT-04: 834 adults with HDM allergic asthma not well controlled by inhaled corticosteroids and with HDM allergic rhinitis, and MT-06: 992 adults with moderate-to-severe HDM allergic rhinitis despite the use of allergy pharmacotherapy and with or without asthma.

resultsThe proportion of subjects experiencing adverse events (AEs) was greater in the active treatment group (12 SQ-HDM; 73% of subjects) compared to placebo (53%). The most common treatment-related AEs were local allergic reactions. No AEs were reported as systemic allergic reactions. Regardless of asthma status, most AEs were mild or moderate (>97% of AEs) and the frequency of serious AEs was low. Subgroup analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in the risk of experiencing moderate or severe treatment-related AEs for subjects with asthma compared to subjects without asthma (p = 0.88). In addition, subjects with partly controlled or uncontrolled asthma were no more likely to experience moderate or severe treatment-related AEs than subjects with controlled asthma (p = 0.42).

conclusionThe SQ HDM SLIT-tablet is well tolerated, and the safety profile was comparable for subjects with HDM respiratory allergic disease irrespective of asthma status.

Indexed as

Administration, SublingualAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAllergensAnimalsAntigens, DermatophagoidesAsthmaBiological AvailabilityDermatophagoides farinaeDermatophagoides pteronyssinusDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleAllergensAntigens, DermatophagoidesPlacebosAllergic asthmaAllergic rhinitisAllergy immunotherapyHouse dust miteSafetySLIT-tablet

Identifiers

PMID28950268
PMCPMC5804837
OpenAlexW2756581728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.