Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28950062›Full record

ArticleACS chemical neuroscience2018

Integrating Transcriptomic Data with Mechanistic Systems Pharmacology Models for Virtual Drug Combination Trials.

Anne Marie Barrette, Mehdi Bouhaddou, Marc R Birtwistle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS chemical neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anne Marie BarretteDepartment of Pharmacological Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai , New York, New York 10029, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1452-9725
Mehdi BouhaddouDepartment of Pharmacological Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai , New York, New York 10029, United States.
Marc R BirtwistleDepartment of Pharmacological Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai , New York, New York 10029, United States.

Funding

System Biology Center in New YorkP50GM071558 · NIGMS · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI IYENGAR, SRINIVAS RAVI V · 2007 to 2017
$22.8M
Pharmaco Response Signatures and Disease MechanismU54HL127365 · NHLBI · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI SORGER, PETER KARL · 2014 to 2019
$13.1M
Drug Combination Signatures for Prediction and Mitigation of ToxicityU54HG008098 · NHGRI · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI BIRTWISTLE, MARC R., SOBIE, ERIC A · 2014 to 2019
$11.8M
Pharmaco Response Signatures and Disease MechanismU54HG006097 · NHGRI · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI MITCHISON, TIMOTHY J, SORGER, PETER KARL · 2010 to 2013
$9.7M
Teaching biomedical and pharmacological trainees to produce FAIR data for AI & ML applicationsT32GM062754 · NIGMS · MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE OF NYU · PI SCHLESSINGER, AVNER · 2001 to 2023
$6.2M
Predicting the Heterogeneity of Cell-Fate DecisionsR01GM104184 · NIGMS · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI BIRTWISTLE, MARC R. · 2014 to 2018
$1.8M
NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG006097NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG008098NHLBI NIH HHS U54 HL127365NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM071558NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM104184NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM062754
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monotherapy clinical trials with mutation-targeted kinase inhibitors, despite some success in other cancers, have yet to impact glioblastoma (GBM). Besides insufficient blood-brain barrier penetration, combinations are key to overcoming obstacles such as intratumoral heterogeneity, adaptive resistance, and the epistatic nature of tumor genomics that cause mutation-targeted therapies to fail. With now hundreds of potential drugs, exploring the combination space clinically and preclinically is daunting. We are building a simulation-based approach that integrates patient-specific data with a mechanistic computational model of pan-cancer driver pathways (receptor tyrosine kinases, RAS/RAF/ERK, PI3K/AKT/mTOR, cell cycle, apoptosis, and DNA damage) to prioritize drug combinations by their simulated effects on tumor cell proliferation and death. Here we illustrate a first step, tailoring the model to 14 GBM patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas defined by an mRNA-seq transcriptome, and then simulating responses to three promiscuous FDA-approved kinase inhibitors (bosutinib, ibrutinib, and cabozantinib) with evidence for blood-brain barrier penetration. The model captures binding of the drug to primary targets and off-targets based on published affinity data and simulates responses of 100 heterogeneous tumor cells within a patient. Single drugs are marginally effective or even counterproductive. Common copy number alterations (PTEN loss, EGFR amplification, and NF1 loss) have a negligible correlation with single-drug or combination efficacy, reinforcing the importance of postgenetic approaches that account for kinase inhibitor promiscuity to match drugs to patients. Drug combinations tend to be either cytostatic or cytotoxic, but seldom both, highlighting the need for considering targeted and nontargeted therapy. Although we focus on GBM, the approach is generally applicable.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationDrug Therapy, CombinationModels, TheoreticalTranscriptomeAdenineAnilidesAniline CompoundsAntineoplastic AgentsApoptosisBlood-Brain BarrierCell CycleCell ProliferationCentral Nervous System NeoplasmsClinical Trials as TopicDrug DiscoveryGenomicsAdenineAnilidesAniline CompoundsAntineoplastic AgentsbosutinibcabozantinibibrutinibNitrilesPiperidinesProtein-Tyrosine KinasesPyrazolesPyridinesPyrimidinesQuinolinesRNA, MessengerBrain tumorsCancer precision medicineCombination therapyMechanistic modelsQuantitative systems pharmacologyStochastic simulation

Identifiers

PMID28950062
PMCPMC5771884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.