Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28950022›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2017

Validation of participant eligibility for pre-exposure prophylaxis: Baseline data from the PRELUDE demonstration project.

Stefanie J Vaccher, Andrew E Grulich, Bridget G Haire, Damian P Conway, Isobel M Poynten, Catriona Ooi, Rosalind Foster, David J Templeton, Iryna B Zablotska, PRELUDE Study Team

Abstract readObservational StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Stefanie J VaccherKirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5170-4110
Andrew E GrulichKirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.
Bridget G HaireKirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.
Damian P ConwayKirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.
Isobel M PoyntenKirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.
Catriona OoiWestern Sydney Sexual Health Centre, Parramatta, New South Wales, Australia.
Rosalind FosterKirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.
David J TempletonKirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.
Iryna B ZablotskaKirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.
PRELUDE Study Team

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Australia, pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is targeted to individuals at high risk for HIV infection. We describe the HIV risk profile and characteristics of PRELUDE participants, and evaluate the population validity of the sample in representing high-risk gay and bisexual men (GBM) eligible for PrEP.

methodsPRELUDE is an on-going, open-label, single-arm observational study. Participants were identified in clinics and screened for eligibility using a paper-based risk assessment tool which followed the New South Wales (NSW) PrEP guidelines. Selection was validated using an independent online behavioural survey, completed by study participants upon enrolment. Demographic information was analysed using descriptive statistics, and kappa tests were used to determine agreement between reporting of high-risk practices in the risk assessment and behavioural survey.

resultsDuring 2014-15, 471 individuals were targeted for enrolment; 341 were assessed for PrEP eligibility and 313 were enrolled. Of these, 303 (97%) identified as GBM. Overall, 85% of GBM met at least one high-risk criterion; 68% reported receptive intercourse with an HIV-positive or unknown status casual male partner, and 37% reported methamphetamine use in the three months preceding enrolment. The remaining 15% were enrolled based on medium-risk behaviours, or at the clinicians' discretion. We found an 82% total agreement between self-reported high-risk behaviour and clinicians' categorisation of GBM as being at high risk for HIV based on PrEP eligibility criteria.

conclusionsBehavioural eligibility criteria used by clinicians successfully identified individuals at high risk for HIV infection. This targeted approach ensures that the greatest public health and HIV prevention benefits can be derived in a setting without universal access to PrEP.

Indexed as

BisexualityHomosexuality, MalePre-Exposure ProphylaxisAdultFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNew South WalesRisk-TakingSexual PartnersTranssexualismYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID28950022
PMCPMC5614574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.