Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28950015›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Comparative analysis of miRNAs of two rapeseed genotypes in response to acetohydroxyacid synthase-inhibiting herbicides by high-throughput sequencing.

Maolong Hu, Huiming Pu, Jianqin Gao, Weihua Long, Feng Chen, Wei Zhang, Xiaoyin Zhou, Qi Peng, Song Chen, Jiefu Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maolong HuInstitute of Industrial Crops, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Nanjing Sub-center, National Center of Oil Crops Improvement / Key Laboratory of Cotton and Rapeseed (Nanjing), Ministry of Agriculture, Nanjing, China.
Huiming PuInstitute of Industrial Crops, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Nanjing Sub-center, National Center of Oil Crops Improvement / Key Laboratory of Cotton and Rapeseed (Nanjing), Ministry of Agriculture, Nanjing, China.
Jianqin GaoInstitute of Industrial Crops, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Nanjing Sub-center, National Center of Oil Crops Improvement / Key Laboratory of Cotton and Rapeseed (Nanjing), Ministry of Agriculture, Nanjing, China.
Weihua LongInstitute of Industrial Crops, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Nanjing Sub-center, National Center of Oil Crops Improvement / Key Laboratory of Cotton and Rapeseed (Nanjing), Ministry of Agriculture, Nanjing, China.
Feng ChenInstitute of Industrial Crops, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Nanjing Sub-center, National Center of Oil Crops Improvement / Key Laboratory of Cotton and Rapeseed (Nanjing), Ministry of Agriculture, Nanjing, China.
Wei ZhangInstitute of Industrial Crops, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Nanjing Sub-center, National Center of Oil Crops Improvement / Key Laboratory of Cotton and Rapeseed (Nanjing), Ministry of Agriculture, Nanjing, China.
Xiaoyin ZhouInstitute of Industrial Crops, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Nanjing Sub-center, National Center of Oil Crops Improvement / Key Laboratory of Cotton and Rapeseed (Nanjing), Ministry of Agriculture, Nanjing, China.
Qi PengInstitute of Industrial Crops, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Nanjing Sub-center, National Center of Oil Crops Improvement / Key Laboratory of Cotton and Rapeseed (Nanjing), Ministry of Agriculture, Nanjing, China.
Song ChenInstitute of Industrial Crops, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Nanjing Sub-center, National Center of Oil Crops Improvement / Key Laboratory of Cotton and Rapeseed (Nanjing), Ministry of Agriculture, Nanjing, China.
Jiefu ZhangInstitute of Industrial Crops, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Nanjing Sub-center, National Center of Oil Crops Improvement / Key Laboratory of Cotton and Rapeseed (Nanjing), Ministry of Agriculture, Nanjing, China.
Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acetohydroxyacid synthase (AHAS), also called acetolactate synthase, is a key enzyme involved in the first step of the biosynthesis of the branched-chain amino acids valine, isoleucine and leucine. Acetohydroxyacid synthase-inhibiting herbicides (AHAS herbicides) are five chemical families of herbicides that inhibit AHAS enzymes, including imidazolinones (IMI), sulfonylureas (SU), pyrimidinylthiobenzoates, triazolinones and triazolopyrimidines. Five AHAS genes have been identified in rapeseed, but little information is available regarding the role of miRNAs in response to AHAS herbicides. In this study, an AHAS herbicides tolerant genotype and a sensitive genotype were used for miRNA comparative analysis. A total of 20 small RNA libraries were obtained of these two genotypes at three time points (0h, 24 h and 48 h) after spraying SU and IMI herbicides with two replicates. We identified 940 conserved miRNAs and 1515 novel candidate miRNAs in Brassica napus using high-throughput sequencing methods combined with computing analysis. A total of 3284 genes were predicted to be targets of these miRNAs, and their functions were shown using GO, KOG and KEGG annotations. The differentiation expression results of miRNAs showed almost twice as many differentiated miRNAs were found in tolerant genotype M342 (309 miRNAs) after SU herbicide application than in sensitive genotype N131 (164 miRNAs). In additiond 177 and 296 miRNAs defined as differentiated in sensitive genotype and tolerant genotype in response to SU herbicides. The miR398 family was observed to be associated with AHAS herbicide tolerance because their expression increased in the tolerant genotype but decreased in the sensitive genotype. Moreover, 50 novel miRNAs from 39 precursors were predicted. There were 8 conserved miRNAs, 4 novel miRNAs and 3 target genes were validated by quantitative real-time PCR experiment. This study not only provides novel insights into the miRNA content of AHAS herbicides tolerant rapeseed in response to AHAS herbicides, but also demonstrates that miRNAs may be involved in AHAS herbicides tolerance.

Indexed as

Acetolactate SynthaseBrassica rapaGenotypeHerbicidesHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMicroRNAsAcetolactate SynthaseHerbicidesMicroRNAs

Identifiers

PMID28950015
PMCPMC5614533
OpenAlexW2760637452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.