ArticleScientific data2017
Compliance with minimum information guidelines in public metabolomics repositories.
Article in Scientific data, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Metabolic Biomarkers of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Aerodigestive Tract: A Systematic Review and Quality Assessment.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2020Pooled it
- Examining the predictive accuracy of metabolomics for small-for-gestational-age babies: a systematic review.BMJ open · 2019Pooled it
- Multi-Platform Metabolomics for Fraud Detection in Spices and Botanical Food Supplements: From Fingerprint Acquisition to Decision-Grade Evidence.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Untargeted Metabolomic Biomarker Discovery for the Detection of Ectopic Pregnancy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- An evaluation of untargeted metabolomics methods to characterize inborn errors of metabolism.Molecular genetics and metabolism · 2024Review
- Animal Metabolite Database: Metabolite Concentrations in Animal Tissues and Convenient Comparison of Quantitative Metabolomic Data.Metabolites · 2023Article
- Untargeted Metabolomics for Integrative Taxonomy: Metabolomics, DNA Marker-Based Sequencing, and Phenotype Bioimaging.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Lipopolysaccharides fromFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2023Article
- Critical assessment of chromatographic metadata in publicly available metabolomics data repositories.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2022Article
- Review
- Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatographic platforms comparison for exhaled breath metabolites analysis.Journal of separation science · 2022Article
- A Current Encyclopedia of Bioinformatics Tools, Data Formats and Resources for Mass Spectrometry Lipidomics.Metabolites · 2022Review
- Non-targeted metabolomics and associations with per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) exposure in humans: A scoping review.Environment international · 2022Article
- Development of RIKEN Plant Metabolome MetaDatabase.Plant & cell physiology · 2022Article
- A Checklist for Reproducible Computational Analysis in Clinical Metabolomics Research.Metabolites · 2022Review
- An anchored experimental design and meta-analysis approach to address batch effects in large-scale metabolomics.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022Article
- Altered metabolomic states elicited by Flg22 and FlgII-28 in Solanum lycopersicum: intracellular perturbations and metabolite defenses.BMC plant biology · 2021Article
- Specialized Metabolites from Ribosome Engineered Strains ofMetabolites · 2021Article
- MassBase: A large-scaled depository of mass spectrometry datasets for metabolome analysis.Plant biotechnology (Tokyo, Japan) · 2021Article
- Untargeted In Silico Compound Classification-A Novel Metabolomics Method to Assess the Chemodiversity in Bryophytes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Metabolomics Standards Initiative (MSI) guidelines were first published in 2007. These guidelines provided reporting standards for all stages of metabolomics analysis: experimental design, biological context, chemical analysis and data processing. Since 2012, a series of public metabolomics databases and repositories, which accept the deposition of metabolomic datasets, have arisen. In this study, the compliance of 399 public data sets, from four major metabolomics data repositories, to the biological context MSI reporting standards was evaluated. None of the reporting standards were complied with in every publicly available study, although adherence rates varied greatly, from 0 to 97%. The plant minimum reporting standards were the most complied with and the microbial and in vitro were the least. Our results indicate the need for reassessment and revision of the existing MSI reporting standards.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.