Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28949050›Full record

Trial reportCancer science2017

Phase 1/2 study of the WT1 peptide cancer vaccine WT4869 in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome.

Yasunori Ueda, Michinori Ogura, Shigesaburo Miyakoshi, Takahiro Suzuki, Yuji Heike, Shuzo Tagashira, Satoru Tsuchiya, Kazuma Ohyashiki, Yasushi Miyazaki

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Vaccines: a promising therapy for myelodysplastic syndrome.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Immunotherapy in AML: a brief review on emerging strategies.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Cancer immunotherapy beyond immune checkpoint inhibitors.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2018
    Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yasunori UedaDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Kurashiki, Japan.
Michinori OguraDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Nagoya Daini Red Cross Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Shigesaburo MiyakoshiDepartment of Hematology, Tokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital and Institute of Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan.
Takahiro SuzukiDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan.
Yuji HeikeDepartment of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Shuzo TagashiraSumitomo Dainippon Pharma, Tokyo, Japan.
Satoru TsuchiyaSumitomo Dainippon Pharma, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazuma OhyashikiDepartment of Hematology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasushi MiyazakiDepartment of Hematology, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

WT4869 is a synthetic peptide vaccine derived from the Wilms' tumor gene 1 (WT1) protein. This phase 1/2 open-label study evaluated the safety and efficacy of WT4869, and biomarkers for response, in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. WT4869 (5-1200 μg/dose) was administered intradermally every 2 weeks, according to a 3 + 3 dose-escalation method in higher-risk (International Prognostic Scoring System score ≥1.5) or lower-risk (score <1.5) red blood cell transfusion-dependent patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. Twenty-six patients were enrolled and treated (median age, 75 years; range, 32 to 89). The most common adverse event was injection site reaction (61.5%). Main grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (30.8%), febrile neutropenia, pneumonia, elevated blood creatine phosphokinase levels and hypoalbuminemia (all 7.7%). Dose-limiting toxicities occurred in 1 patient in the 50 μg/dose cohort (pyrexia, muscle hemorrhage and hypoalbuminemia) and 1 patient in the 400 μg/dose cohort (pneumonitis); however, the maximum tolerated dose could not be determined from this trial. The overall response rate was 18.2%, the disease control rate was 59.1% and median overall survival was 64.71 weeks (95% confidence interval: 50.29, 142.86) as assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Subgroup analysis of azacitidine-refractory patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (11 patients) showed median overall survival of 55.71 weeks (approximately 13 months). WT1-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte induction was observed in 11 of 25 evaluable patients. WT4869 was well tolerated in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome and preliminary data suggest that WT4869 is efficacious. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.jp as JapicCTI-101374.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCancer VaccinesDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMaximum Tolerated DoseMiddle AgedMyelodysplastic SyndromesVaccines, SubunitCancer VaccinesVaccines, SubunitAcute myeloid leukemiaazacitidine-refractory patientsmyelodysplastic syndromesynthetic peptide vaccineWilms’ tumor 1 protein

Identifiers

PMID28949050
PMCPMC5715294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.