Can low-load blood flow restriction training elicit muscle hypertrophy with modest inflammation and cellular stress, but minimal muscle damage?

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Combined effects of blood flow restriction training and nutritional intervention on muscle adaptations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026
   Article
2. Effects of autoregulated and non-autoregulated blood flow restriction on vastus medialis oblique responses during low-load resistance exercise.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Proliferation of myogenic stem cells in human skeletal muscle in response to low-load resistance training with blood flow restriction.2012

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as