Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28948961›Full record

ArticleThe Indian journal of medical research2017

Pefloxacin as a surrogate marker for quinolone susceptibility in

Priyanka Sharma, Sushila Dahiya, Bhavana Kumari, Veeraraghavan Balaji, Seema Sood, Bimal Kumar Das, Arti Kapil

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Indian journal of medical research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Quinolone Susceptibility inJournal of laboratory physicians · 2020
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Phenolic Rich Fractions from Mycelium and Fruiting Body ofAdvances in pharmacological sciences · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Priyanka SharmaDepartment of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Sushila DahiyaDepartment of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Bhavana KumariDepartment of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Veeraraghavan BalajiDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Seema SoodDepartment of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Bimal Kumar DasDepartment of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Arti KapilDepartment of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · INChristian Medical College & Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

objectivesThe emergence of resistance to fluoroquinolones in enteric fever despite the pathogen being susceptible by in vitro laboratory results, led to repeated changes in Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) guidelines for this class of antibiotics to have specific and sensitive interpretative criteria. In 2015, CLSI added pefloxacin disk diffusion criteria as a surrogate marker for fluoroquinolone susceptibility. This study was carried out to evaluate the use of pefloxacin as a surrogate marker for ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin and levofloxacin susceptibility in clinical isolates of Salmonella Typhi and S. Paratyphi A.

methodsA total of 412 strains of S. Typhi and S. Paratyphi A were studied for pefloxacin disk diffusion test as a surrogate marker for susceptibility to ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin and levofloxacin as per CLSI and the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) guidelines. Molecular mechanisms of resistance to fluoroquinolones were also determined and correlated with pefloxacin susceptibility breakpoints.

resultsOf the total 412 strains, 34 were susceptible to ciprofloxacin and 33 each to levofloxacin and ofloxacin using CLSI minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) breakpoints. There was a positive correlation between MICs with correlation coefficients 0.917, 0.896 and 0.958 for the association between ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin and ofloxacin and levofloxacin, respectively (P <0.001). The sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of pefloxacin as a surrogate marker using ciprofloxacin MIC as a gold standard were 100, 99.5 and 94.4 per cent, while 100, 99.2 and 91.7 per cent taking ofloxacin and levofloxacin MIC as gold standard. Mutations in target genes correlated with the pefloxacin susceptibility results. INTERPRETATION &

conclusionsOur results showed that pefloxacin served as a good surrogate marker for the detection of susceptibility to ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin and levofloxacin in S. Typhi and S. Paratyphi A. Further studies are required to confirm these findings.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBiomarkersDrug Resistance, BacterialHumansMutationParatyphoid FeverPefloxacinSalmonella entericaSalmonella paratyphi AAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiomarkersPefloxacin

Identifiers

PMID28948961
PMCPMC5644305
OpenAlexW2774202835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.