Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28948900›Full record

ArticleLaboratory animals2017

Maximizing the success of bile duct cannulation studies in rats: recommendations for best practice.

Natalie Burden, John Kendrick, Lindsay Knight, Victoria McGregor, Helen Murphy, Malcolm Punler, Hans van Wijk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Laboratory animals, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Natalie Burden1 NC3Rs, London, UK.
John Kendrick2 Covance Laboratories Ltd, Harrogate, North Yorkshire, UK.
Lindsay Knight3 Envigo CRS UK Ltd, Alconbury, Huntingdon, UK.
Victoria McGregor4 Charles River Laboratories Edinburgh Ltd, Tranent, East Lothian, UK.
Helen Murphy3 Envigo CRS UK Ltd, Alconbury, Huntingdon, UK.
Malcolm Punler4 Charles River Laboratories Edinburgh Ltd, Tranent, East Lothian, UK.
Hans van Wijk2 Covance Laboratories Ltd, Harrogate, North Yorkshire, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bile duct cannulation (BDC) studies are usually carried out in the rat to support the absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion profiling of novel agrochemicals and pharmaceuticals. The different aspects of these studies (e.g. surgical preparation, dosing and collection of bile) can be intricate and/or technically complex. The animals are often kept singly housed for the duration of the studies following surgical implantation of the cannulas. The generation of insufficient data to meet the study objectives, for example due to failure in cannula patency, can result in the need to repeat these studies. A working group of contract research organizations that routinely carry out BDC studies was brought together by the National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3Rs) to share their experiences, and to establish the key factors necessary to ensure routinely high success rates. Through these discussions the group has identified opportunities for best practice across various aspects of the studies. The aim of these recommendations is to support all staff involved in conducting BDC studies to maximize the amount of useful data generated using the fewest animals possible, while ensuring the highest possible standards of animal welfare.

Indexed as

Animal WelfareModels, AnimalAnimalsBile DuctsCatheterizationRatsResearch3Rslaboratory animal welfaremetabolismrefinementrodents

Identifiers

PMID28948900
PMCPMC5621694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.