Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28948700›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of methods in psychiatric research2017

Daily fluctuation of emotions and memories thereof: Design and methods of an experience sampling study of major depression, social phobia, and controls.

Andrew T Gloster, Marcel Miché, Hanna Wersebe, Thorsten Mikoteit, Jürgen Hoyer, Christian Imboden, Klaus Bader, Andrea H Meyer, Martin Hatzinger, Roselind Lieb

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of methods in psychiatric research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Well-being in major depression and social phobia with and without comorbidity.International journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHP
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Andrew T GlosterDepartment of Psychology, Division of Clinical Psychology and Intervention Science, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3751-0878
Marcel MichéDepartment of Psychology, Division of Clinical Psychology and Epidemiology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Hanna WersebeDepartment of Psychology, Division of Clinical Psychology and Epidemiology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Thorsten MikoteitPsychiatric Hospital, Centre for Affective, Stress and Sleep Disorders, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Jürgen HoyerInstitute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Christian ImbodenPsychiatric Services, Solothurn, Switzerland.
Klaus BaderPsychiatric Hospital, Centre for Specialized Psychotherapy, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Andrea H MeyerDepartment of Psychology, Division of Clinical Psychology and Epidemiology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Martin HatzingerPsychiatric Services, Solothurn, Switzerland.
Roselind LiebDepartment of Psychology, Division of Clinical Psychology and Epidemiology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Symptom fluctuations and the dynamic contexts provoking these are poorly understood. This deficit is compounded by people's limited ability to accurately report about such dimensions in retrospect. Utilizing the advantages of experience sampling methodology (ESM), this study rigorously describes and tests proximal environmental, neurobiological and psychological factors associated with symptoms and mood states. Participants were assigned to three diagnostic groups: Major Depressive Disorder (MDD; n = 118), Social Phobia (SP; n = 47), or a Control Group without SP or MDD (CG; n = 119). Laboratory assessments included cognitive abilities, memory, constructs, and brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). ESM lasted seven days, with six assessments per day covering symptoms, affect, daily events, social interactions, post-event processing, well-being, etc. Morning cortisol and actigraphy were also assessed during ESM. Thereafter, participants provided subjective retrospective recall estimates of the emotions they reported during ESM. The multi-level data of >10,000 observations will allow for thorough examination of fluctuations of psychopathology and well-being in two highly prevalent disorders. Using two clinical groups and a non-affected control group, the clinical specificity versus generalizability of processes can be directly tested, thus providing stimulating information about the overlap and differences between anxiety and affective disorders. This research informs about the development, fluctuation, and maintaining factors of emotions and symptoms and examines the accuracy with which participants recall these dimensions.

Indexed as

Ecological Momentary AssessmentInterpersonal RelationsActigraphyAdolescentAdultAffectFemaleHumansMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMental RecallMiddle AgedPhobia, SocialYoung AdultdepressionESMfluctuationmemory-experience gapsocial phobia

Identifiers

PMID28948700
PMCPMC6877193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.