Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28948699›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of methods in psychiatric research2017

Screening for trauma-related symptoms via a smartphone app: The validity of Smart Assessment on your Mobile in referred police officers.

Christianne A I van der Meer, Anne Bakker, Bart A L Schrieken, Marthe C Hoofwijk, Miranda Olff

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of methods in psychiatric research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklist for DSM-5: A Systematic Review of Existing Psychometric Evidence.Clinical psychology : a publication of the Division of Clinical Psychology of the American Psychological Association · 2023
    Article
  8. PeerJ · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. E-health applications in the field of traumatic stress.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The Interactive Trauma Scale: A Web-Based Measure for Children with Autism.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christianne A I van der MeerAcademic Medical Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7115-6705
Anne BakkerAcademic Medical Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Bart A L SchriekenInterapy, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marthe C HoofwijkCentre for Psychological Trauma, Diemen, The Netherlands.
Miranda OlffAcademic Medical Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam · NLArq Psychotrauma Expert Group · NLInter-Psy · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To facilitate easily accessible screening for trauma-related symptoms, a web-based application called Smart Assessment on your Mobile (SAM) was developed. In this study, we examined whether SAM was able to accurately identify posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression in adults. Eighty-nine referred police officers completed SAM, containing the PTSD Checklist for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-5 (PCL-5) and the Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21), on their own device prior to a diagnostic interview where the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5) and Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID-I/P) were administered. Results showed a substantial agreement between SAM and the diagnostic interview in the assessment of PTSD and depression. An optimal trade-off between sensitivity (89%) and specificity (68%) levels was found at a cut-off score of 31 on the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (area under the curve = 0.845, 95% CI [0.765, 0.925], diagnostic odds ratio = 15.97). This is one of the first studies to support the validity and reliability of a mobile screener following trauma. SAM may facilitate screening for trauma-related symptoms on a large scale and could be a first step in a stepped-care model for trauma survivors to help identify individuals who need further diagnostics and care.

Indexed as

Medical Informatics ApplicationsAdultAgedDepressive DisorderFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMobile ApplicationsPolicePsychological TraumaReferral and ConsultationReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySmartphoneStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticmHealthposttraumatic stress disorderscreeningsmartphone applicationstrauma-related symptoms

Identifiers

PMID28948699
PMCPMC5639363
OpenAlexW2759641132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.