Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28948640›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2018

Clinical evaluation of a multiparametric ELISA as a rapid tool for routinely diagnosing IgG-mediated autoimmune blistering dermatoses in ethnic Slavs.

Justyna Gornowicz-Porowska, Agnieszka Seraszek-Jaros, Monika Bowszyc-Dmochowska, Paweł Bartkiewicz, Elżbieta Kaczmarek, Marian Dmochowski

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Justyna Gornowicz-PorowskaAutoimmune Blistering Dermatoses Section, Department of Dermatology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3106-064X
Agnieszka Seraszek-JarosDepartment of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Monika Bowszyc-DmochowskaCutaneous Histopathology and Immunopathology Section, Department of Dermatology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Paweł BartkiewiczAutoimmune Blistering Dermatoses Section, Department of Dermatology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Elżbieta KaczmarekDepartment of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Marian DmochowskiAutoimmune Blistering Dermatoses Section, Department of Dermatology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Poznan University of Medical Sciences · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTechnical innovation of autoimmune blistering dermatoses (ABDs) diagnosis aimed at multiplex approach. Two multiparametric ELISA tests are commercially available for ABDs serology. The aim was to compare diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric and monospecific ELISAs and to examine the diagnostic value/agreement of multivariant ELISA in compliance with traditional diagnostic setup for ABDs.

methodsIn total, 128 sera from suspected ABDs patients were studied (27 sera in order to compare ELISAs). Multivariant ELISA (detection of IgG against desmoglein 1 and 3 - DSG1/3; BP180, BP230, envoplakin, type VII collagen), monovariant ELISA, and statistical analysis were performed.

resultsWith the use of sera from patients with suspected ABDs, the multiparametric ELISA yield an agreement of 84% with traditional stepwise diagnostics. Multivariant ELISA with BP180 and BP230 showed 87.5% and 80% sensitivity, 87.5% and 91% specificity, 87.5% reliability as well as 87.5% and 80% positive predictive value, 87.5% and 91% negative predictive value, respectively, in relation to monospecific ELISA. Multivariant ELISA with DSG1 and DSG3 showed 50% and 80% sensitivity, 100% and 80% specificity, 85% and 80% reliability as well as 100% and 57% positive predictive value, 82% and 92% negative predictive value, respectively, in relation to monospecific ELISA. A better rate of agreement was observed among ELISA systems with BP180 and BP230, than with ELISA systems with DSG1 and DSG3.

conclusionMultivariant ELISA test combined with clinical examinations and DIF is recommended as a minimal approach to diagnosing ABDs in ethnic Slavs.

Indexed as

AutoantibodiesAutoimmune DiseasesCohort StudiesEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayEthnicityEurope, EasternHumansImmunoglobulin GMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySkin Diseases, VesiculobullousAutoantibodiesImmunoglobulin Gautoantibodiesearly diagnosisenzyme-linked immunosorbent assayimmunologic testsskin diseasesvesiculobullous

Identifiers

PMID28948640
PMCPMC6816848
OpenAlexW2760068476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.