ReviewCurrent treatment options in cardiovascular medicine2017
The Right Heart: Acute and Chronic Issues.
Review in Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Athlete's Heart Revisited: Historical, Clinical, and Molecular Perspectives.Circulation research · 2025Review
- Assessment of right ventricular structure and systolic function in amateur marathon runners using three-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2023Article
- Evidence of Failed Resolution Mechanisms in Arrhythmogenic Inflammation, Fibrosis and Right Heart Disease.Biomolecules · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
opinion statementCardiovascular remodeling in response to sustained moderate and high-intensity exercise is a well-established phenomenon. Following more than a century of work focused on the left ventricle (LV), remodeling of the right side of the heart has recently become a topic of considerable scientific and clinical interest. Morphologic and functional changes have now been well documented in the right ventricle (RV) after isolated bouts of endurance exercise and in association with long-term sustained training. Although exercise-induced cardiac remodeling is classically viewed as an adaptive, clinically benign process, it has recently been hypothesized that repetitive bouts of intense exercise may trigger pathologic changes in the RV characterized by patchy fibrosis and a predisposition to arrhythmia. At present, this concept remains speculative due to the absence of definitive clinical data. While we await scientific clarification of this intriguing hypothesis, several practical clinical considerations are noteworthy. RV dilation is common among trained endurance athletes. As such, asymptomatic athletes with RV dilation do not require additional diagnostic evaluation unless dilation is accompanied by substantial decrements in systolic function or other structural abnormalities suggestive of genetic heart disease. In contrast, RV dilation among athletes with either symptoms or a family history of genetic heart disease requires extensive multi-modality assessment including maximal effort-limited exercise testing, ambulatory rhythm monitoring, advanced non-invasive imaging, and invasive electrophysiology study. This review will discuss the contemporary understanding of how the RV responds to exercise with an emphasis on the relevance of this phenomenon in clinical cardiovascular practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.