ArticleNanoscale research letters2017
Synthesis and Luminescence Properties of Water Soluble α-NaGdF
Article in Nanoscale research letters, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dual-mode luminescence anti-counterfeiting and white light emission of NaGdFRSC advances · 2023Article
- Controllable structural and optical properties of NaYF4:Tm, Yb microparticles by YbRSC advances · 2023Article
- Homo-hetero/core-shell structure design strategy of NaYFRSC advances · 2021Article
- Solvothermal synthesis and modification of NaYFRSC advances · 2019Article
- Enhanced upconversion fluorescent probe of single NaYFRSC advances · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hexagonal phase (β) sodium rare earth tetrafluorides (NaREF
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.