Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28948501›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in cardiovascular medicine2017

Multimodality Imaging of the Right Ventricle.

Christiane M Abouzeid, Tara Shah, Ansh Johri, Jonathan W Weinsaft, Jiwon Kim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Echocardiographic right ventricular remodeling after percutaneous atrial septal defect closure.International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Tricuspid valve: Once disregarded, now acknowledged.International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease · 2022
    Review
  12. Assessment of right ventricular size and function from cardiovascular magnetic resonance images using artificial intelligence.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christiane M AbouzeidGreenberg Cardiology Division/Department of Medicine, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, 525 East 68th Street, Starr-4, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
Tara ShahGreenberg Cardiology Division/Department of Medicine, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, 525 East 68th Street, Starr-4, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
Ansh JohriGreenberg Cardiology Division/Department of Medicine, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, 525 East 68th Street, Starr-4, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
Jonathan W WeinsaftGreenberg Cardiology Division/Department of Medicine, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, 525 East 68th Street, Starr-4, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
Jiwon KimGreenberg Cardiology Division/Department of Medicine, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, 525 East 68th Street, Starr-4, New York, NY, 10021, USA. jik9027@med.cornell.edu.

Funding

CMR Myocardial Tissue Based Prediction of Ischemic MR Revascularization ResponseR01HL128278 · NHLBI · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI WEINSAFT, JONATHAN W. · 2015 to 2019
$3.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL128278
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementRight ventricular (RV) structure and function is clinically important in a wide range of conditions. While conventional echocardiography (echo) methods are widely used, its limitations in RV assessment due its complex geometry are well recognized. New applications of traditional echo methods as well as emerging echo techniques including 3-dimensional (3D) echo and speckle tracking strain have the potential to overcome limitations of conventional echo, though widespread clinical use remains to be seen. Volumetric methods using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and computed tomography (CT) provide accurate assessment of RV function without geometric assumptions. In addition, tissue characterization imaging for myocardial scar and fat using CMR and CT provides important information regarding the RV beyond structure and function alone and has clinical applications for diagnosis and prognosis in a broad range of pathologies. Limitations also exist for these two advanced modalities including availability and patient suitability for CMR and need for contrast and radiation exposure for CT. The complementary role of each modality for the RV as well as emerging evidence for the use of each imaging method in diagnosis and management of RV pathologies is outlined in this study.

Indexed as

3-dimensional (3D) echoCardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)ImagingMultimodality imagingRight ventricular (RV) structure

Identifiers

PMID28948501
PMCPMC6002848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.