Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28948428›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2018

Practices of traditional beef farmers in their production and marketing of cattle in Zambia.

Chisoni Mumba, Barbara Häsler, John B Muma, Musso Munyeme, Doreen Chilolo Sitali, Eystein Skjerve, Karl M Rich

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Seroprevalence of Bovine Brucellosis in Selected Districts of Zambia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Chisoni MumbaDepartment of Disease Control, School of Veterinary Medicine, The University of Zambia, P.O. Box 32379, Lusaka, Zambia. sulemumba@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4662-0876
Barbara HäslerDepartment of Pathobiology and Population Sciences, The Royal Veterinary College, Hawkshead Lane, North Mymms, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, AL9 7TA, UK.
John B MumaDepartment of Disease Control, School of Veterinary Medicine, The University of Zambia, P.O. Box 32379, Lusaka, Zambia.
Musso MunyemeDepartment of Disease Control, School of Veterinary Medicine, The University of Zambia, P.O. Box 32379, Lusaka, Zambia.
Doreen Chilolo SitaliDepartment of Disease Control, School of Veterinary Medicine, The University of Zambia, P.O. Box 32379, Lusaka, Zambia.
Eystein SkjerveDepartment of Food Safety and Infection Biology, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, P.O. Box 8146, Oslo, Norway.
Karl M RichInternational Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), East and Southeast Asia Regional Office, Room 301-302, B1 Building, Van Phuc Diplomatic Compound, 298 Kim Ma Street, Ba Dinh District, Hanoi, Vietnam.
University of Zambia · ZMNational Institute of Veterinary Research · VNNorwegian University of Life Sciences · NORoyal Veterinary College · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the practices of traditional cattle farmers in developing countries is an important factor in the development of appropriate, pro-poor disease control policies, and in formulating regional-specific production incentives that can improve productivity. This paper describes the production, husbandry practices, economics, and constraints of traditional cattle farming in Zambia. A cross-sectional study design was used to obtain data from traditional cattle farmers (n = 699) using a structured questionnaire. Data analyses were carried out using SPSS and STATA statistical packages. The results revealed that the majority [65% (95% CI: 59.3-71.1)] of farmers practised a transhumant cattle herding system under communal grazing. In these transhumant herding systems, animal husbandry and management systems were found to be of poor quality, in terms of supplementary feeding, vaccination coverage, deworming, uptake of veterinary services, usage of artificial insemination, and dip tanks all being low or absent. East Coast Fever was the most common disease, affecting 60% (95% CI: 56.4-63.7) of farmers. Cattle sales were low, as farmers only sold a median of two cattle per household per year. Crop farming was found to be the main source of farm income (47%) in agro-pastoralist communities, followed by cattle farming (28%) and other sources (25%). The median cost of production in the surveyed provinces was reported at US$316, while that of revenue from cattle and cattle products sales was estimated at US$885 per herd per year. This translates to an estimated gross margin of US$569, representing 64.3% of revenue.There is considerable diversity in disease distribution, animal husbandry practices, economics, and challenges in traditional cattle production in different locations of Zambia. Therefore, to improve the productivity of the traditional cattle sub-sector, policy makers and stakeholders in the beef value chain must develop fit-for-purpose policies and interventions that consider these variations.

Indexed as

CattleAdultAgedAnimal HusbandryAnimalsCross-Sectional StudiesFarmersFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultZambiaBeef value chainCattle keeping practicesTraditional cattle farmersZambia

Identifiers

PMID28948428
OpenAlexW2757156115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.