ArticleEmergency radiology2018
Awareness of radiation risks from CT scans among patients and providers and obstacles for informed decision-making.
Article in Emergency radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Radiation-Related Knowledge and Attitudes Toward Medical Imaging Among the General Population in Iraq: A Cross-Sectional Survey.Journal of medical radiation sciences · 2026Article
- Authorized surrogate presence and its association with early in-hospital delays and outcomes in acute ischemic stroke.International journal of emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Quantifying and Contextualizing Radiation Doses in Common Pediatric Medical Imaging Examinations.Journal of pediatrics. Clinical practice · 2025Article
- Communicating radiation dose in medical imaging: How to best inform our patients?Acta radiologica open · 2023Article
- The why, who, how, and what of communicating CT radiation risks to patients and healthcare providers.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2023Review
- Observational
- Patient Perceptions and Knowledge of Ionizing Radiation From Medical Imaging.JAMA network open · 2021Article
- The cumulative radiation dose paradigm in pediatric imaging.The British journal of radiology · 2021Review
- Awareness of radiation hazards in patients attending radiology departments.Radiation and environmental biophysics · 2021Article
- Clinical concordance with Image Gently guidelines for pediatric computed tomography: a study across 663,417 CT scans at 53 clinical facilities.Pediatric radiology · 2021Article
- Radiation use in diagnostic imaging in children: approaching the value of the pediatric radiology community.Pediatric radiology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionUsing the study design from a prominent 2004 study, we aimed to reassess patient, provider, and radiologist awareness of CT radiation more than a decade later.
methodsAdults presenting to the emergency department of a tertiary care center over a 2-week period with mild to moderate pain requiring an abdominopelvic CT scan were surveyed. Patients were asked if anyone had discussed the risks/benefits of the CT scan including radiation dose and were asked to estimate their dose compared to a chest X-ray. Emergency providers and radiologists were given similar surveys and were asked about potential obstacles to discussing CT radiation with patients.
resultsA total of 101 patients, 570 emergency providers, and 161 radiologists were surveyed. Twenty-three percent (14/61) of patients, 39% (219/568) of emergency providers, and 48% (77/161) of radiologists correctly selected the radiation dose range of an abdominopelvic CT. Seventy-eight percent (441/567) of emergency providers reported routinely discussing radiation dose with patients, while 20% (20/98) of patients reported that their emergency provider discussed radiation dose with them. Time limitation and concern of dissuading the patient from CT were the most commonly reported obstacles for discussing risks.
conclusionsPatients and providers in 2015 appear to be more aware of radiation dose from CT than they were in 2004. Discussion of CT scan radiation exposure and associated risks only occurs sometimes and may actually occur less frequently than perceived by emergency providers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28948391What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.