ArticleCognitive processing2018
Effect of three different regimens of repeated methamphetamine on rats' cognitive performance.
Article in Cognitive processing, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation Restores Cognitive Impairment in Morphine-Withdrawn Rats: Role of BDNF and Glial Cells in the Hippocampus.Addiction biology · 2025Article
- MDPV (3,4-methylenedioxypyrovalerone) administered to mice during development of the central nervous system produces persistent learning and memory impairments.Pharmacological reports : PR · 2024Article
- Luteolin reversed anxiety and depressive-like behavior via modulation of the NF-κB/NLRP3 inflammasome axis in the hippocampus of rats subjected to sleep deprivation.Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2024Article
- The Atypical Dopamine Transporter Inhibitor CE-158 Enhances Dopamine Neurotransmission in the Prefrontal Cortex of Male Rats: A Behavioral, Electrophysiological, and Microdialysis Study.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2023Article
- A Review on the Disruption of Novel Object Recognition Induced by Methamphetamine.Addiction & health · 2023Review
- Neurochemical and behavioral comparisons of contingent and non-contingent methamphetamine exposure following binge or yoked long-access self-administration paradigms.Psychopharmacology · 2020Article
- Effects of Methamphetamine Exposure on Fear Learning and Memory in Adult and Adolescent Rats.Neurochemical research · 2019Article
- Effects of Molecular Hydrogen on Methamphetamine-Induced Neurotoxicity and Spatial Memory Impairment.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neurocognitive impairment in response to methamphetamine (MA) has been proven in a variety of experimental and clinical studies. Elucidation of the underlying mechanisms of MA-induced cognitive deficits and finding preventive/therapeutic approaches need best-suited animal models. In modeling repeated MA exposure, while some believes that escalating doses simulate drug abuse conditions, others believe this regimen confers a preconditioning protection. The present study aimed to compare the effects of three different regimens of repeated MA administration on memory and cognitive function of adult rats. Rats in two different experimental groups were treated with escalating paradigms consisted of twice-daily i.p. injections; 1-4 mg/kg over 7 days or 1-10 mg/kg over 10 days. The third group received twice-daily doses of 15 mg/kg every other day over 14 days. Spatial working memory, novel object recognition task and anxiety-like behavior were measured sequentially in all MA-treated rats and vehicle-treated controls started from day 8 after last injection. All MA regimens decreased rates of spontaneous alternation in Y-maze and increased anxiety-like response. Short-term recognition memory was unchanged across all MA-treated animals, while long-term memory was impaired in the second and third MA regimen. Though MA deleterious effect especially in recognition memory is somehow dose dependent, preconditioning effect of increasing doses may be ruled out at least in the case of parameters measured here.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.