Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28948033›Full record

ArticleJournal of hip preservation surgery2017

Risk of failure of primary hip arthroscopy-a population-based study.

Ryan M Degen, Ting J Pan, Brenda Chang, Nabil Mehta, Peter D Chamberlin, Anil S Ranawat, Danyal H Nawabi, Bryan T Kelly, Stephen Lyman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hip preservation surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Revealing a Natural Model of Pre-Osteoarthritis of the Hip Through Study of Femoroacetabular Impingement.HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Limited clinical utility of a machine learning revision prediction model based on a national hip arthroscopy registry.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Editorial.Journal of hip preservation surgery · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ryan M DegenDepartment of Sports Medicine and Shoulder Service, Center for Hip Preservation and.
Ting J PanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Healthcare Research Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, 525 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
Brenda ChangDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Healthcare Research Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, 525 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
Nabil MehtaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Healthcare Research Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, 525 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
Peter D ChamberlinDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Healthcare Research Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, 525 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
Anil S RanawatDepartment of Sports Medicine and Shoulder Service, Center for Hip Preservation and.
Danyal H NawabiDepartment of Sports Medicine and Shoulder Service, Center for Hip Preservation and.
Bryan T KellyDepartment of Sports Medicine and Shoulder Service, Center for Hip Preservation and.
Stephen LymanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Healthcare Research Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, 525 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA.

Funding

Effective Treatment of Femoraacetabular Impingement of the HipR01AR066069 · NIAMS · HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY · PI LYMAN, STEPHEN L · 2014 to 2018
$1.9M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR066069
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aims of this study are (i) to report on the rates of subsequent surgery following hip arthroscopy and (ii) to identify prognostic variables associated with revision surgery, survival rates and complication rates. The Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database, a census of hospital admissions and ambulatory surgery in New York State, was used to identify cases of primary hip arthroscopy. Demographic information and rates of subsequent revision hip arthroscopy or arthroplasty were collected. The risks were modeled with use of age, sex, procedure and surgeon volume as risk factors. Survival analyses were also performed, and 30-day complication was recorded. We identified 8267 procedures in 7836 patients from 1998 to 2012. Revision surgery occurred in 1087 cases (13.2%) at a mean of 1.7 ± 1.6 (mean ± SD) years. Revision arthroscopy accounted for 311 cases (3.8%), and arthroplasty for 796 (9.7%) cases. Survival analysis showed a 2-year survival rate of 88.1%, 5-year of 80.7% and 10-year of 74.9%. Regression analysis revealed that age >50 years [hazard ratio (HR) 2.09; confidence interval (CI) 1.82-2.39,

Identifiers

PMID28948033
PMCPMC5604179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.