ArticleChinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu2017
Evaluating efficacy of screening for upper gastrointestinal cancer in China: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Article in Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Initial results from a multi-center population-based cluster randomized trial of esophageal and gastric cancer screening in China.BMC gastroenterology · 2020Trial
- Cost-Effectiveness of Initiating Colorectal Cancer Screening at Age 40 Among Average-Risk Individuals in China.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Endoscopic ultrasound-based radiomics for predicting pathologic upgrade in esophageal low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Can patients with mild non-neoplastic lesions diagnosed at baseline screening be safely exempt from surveillance: evidence from multicenter community-based cohorts.Science China. Life sciences · 2025Article
- The spatiotemporal associations between esophageal and gastric cancers provide evidence for its joint endoscopic screening in China: a population-based study.BMC medicine · 2024Article
- Reducing the global cancer burden with gastrointestinal screening: China's 30 years practice.Cancer biology & medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- A cluster randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of esophageal and gastric cancer screening in mortality reduction in a non-high-incidence area: methodology and initial results.Annals of translational medicine · 2022Article
- Sociodemographic disparities in gastric cancer and the gastric precancerous cascade: A population-based study.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2022Article
- The psychological impact of esophageal cancer screening on anxiety and depression in China.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- A Radiomics Nomogram for Non-Invasive Prediction of Progression-Free Survival in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2022Article
- Biological correlates before esophageal cancer screening and after diagnosis.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Estimated Cost-effectiveness of Endoscopic Screening for Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer in High-Risk Areas in China.JAMA network open · 2021Article
- Improved esophageal squamous cell carcinoma screening effectiveness by risk-stratified endoscopic screening: evidence from high-risk areas in China.Cancer communications (London, England) · 2021Article
- Article
- Gastric cancer: Epidemiology, risk factors and prevention strategies.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2020Article
- Classifying risk level of gastric cancer: Evaluation of questionnaire-based prediction model.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2020Article
- Article
- Estimating Individualized Absolute Risk for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Population-Based Study in High-Risk Areas of China.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of screening procedure for upper gastrointestinal cancer in both high-risk and non-high-risk areas in China.
settingSeven cities/counties, representing three economical-geographical regions (Eastern, Central and Western) in China, were selected as screening centers: three in high-risk areas and four in non-high-risk areas.
participantsVillages/communities in these seven centers regarded as clusters were randomly assigned to either intervention group (screening by endoscopic examination) or control group (with normal community care) in a 1:1 ratio stratified by each center. Eligible participants are local residents aged 40-69 years in the selected villages/communities with no history of cancer or endoscopic examination in the latest 3 years who are mentally and physically competent. Those who are not willing to take endoscopic examination or are unwilling to sign the consent form are excluded from the study. Totally 140,000 participants will be enrolled.
interventionsIn high-risk areas of upper gastrointestinal cancer, all subjects in screening group will be screened by endoscopy. In non-high-risk areas, 30% of the subjects in screening group, identified through a survey, will be screened by endoscopy. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome is the mortality caused by upper gastrointestinal cancer. The secondary outcomes include detection rate, incidence rate, survival rate, and clinical stage distribution. Additional data on quality of life and cost-effectiveness will also be collected to answer important questions regarding screening effects.
conclusionsScreening strategy evaluated in those areas with positive findings may be promoted nationally and applied to the majority of Chinese people. On the other hand, negative findings will provide scientific evidence for abandoning a test and shifting resources elsewhere.
trial registrationThe study has been registered with the Protocol Registration System in Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (identifier: ChiCTR-EOR-16008577).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.