Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28947782›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Microchamber Cultures of Bladder Cancer: A Platform for Characterizing Drug Responsiveness and Resistance in PDX and Primary Cancer Cells.

Pantea Gheibi, Shuxiong Zeng, Kyung Jin Son, Tam Vu, Ai-Hong Ma, Marc A Dall'Era, Stanley Alexander Yap, Ralph W de Vere White, Chong-Xian Pan, Alexander Revzin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Preclinical Models for Bladder Cancer Research.Hematology/oncology clinics of North America · 2021
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Fidelity of a PDX-CR model for bladder cancer.Biochemical and biophysical research communications · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Organoid models in bladder cancer: From bench to bedside?Bladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Pantea GheibiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Shuxiong ZengDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA.
Kyung Jin SonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Tam VuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Ai-Hong MaDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA.
Marc A Dall'EraDepartment of Urology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, 95817, USA.
Stanley Alexander YapDepartment of Urology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, 95817, USA.
Ralph W de Vere WhiteDepartment of Urology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, 95817, USA.
Chong-Xian PanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA. cxpan@ucdavis.edu.
Alexander RevzinDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA. revzin.alexander@mayo.edu.

Funding

Staff InvestigatorsP30CA093373 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI Laura Marcu · 2002 to 2026
$84.9M
Development of targeting nanotherapeutics against bladder cancerI01BX001784 · VA · VA NORTHERN CALIFORNIA HEALTH CARE SYS · PI PAN, CHONG-XIAN · 2014 to 2017
–
BLRD VA I01 BX001784NCI NIH HHS P30 CA093373
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Precision cancer medicine seeks to target the underlying genetic alterations of cancer; however, it has been challenging to use genetic profiles of individual patients in identifying the most appropriate anti-cancer drugs. This spurred the development of patient avatars; for example, patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) established in mice and used for drug exposure studies. However, PDXs are associated with high cost, long development time and low efficiency of engraftment. Herein we explored the use of microfluidic devices or microchambers as simple and low-cost means of maintaining bladder cancer cells over extended periods of times in order to study patterns of drug responsiveness and resistance. When placed into 75 µm tall microfluidic chambers, cancer cells grew as ellipsoids reaching millimeter-scale dimeters over the course of 30 days in culture. We cultured three PDX and three clinical patient specimens with 100% success rate. The turn-around time for a typical efficacy study using microchambers was less than 10 days. Importantly, PDX-derived ellipsoids in microchambers retained patterns of drug responsiveness and resistance observed in PDX mice and also exhibited in vivo-like heterogeneity of tumor responses. Overall, this study establishes microfluidic cultures of difficult-to-maintain primary cancer cells as a useful tool for precision cancer medicine.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCells, CulturedDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalDrug ResistanceHumansMicrofluidicsModels, TheoreticalOrgan Culture TechniquesOrganoidsUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID28947782
PMCPMC5612935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.