Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28947761›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Human Cerebrospinal fluid promotes long-term neuronal viability and network function in human neocortical organotypic brain slice cultures.

Niklas Schwarz, Ulrike B S Hedrich, Hannah Schwarz, Harshad P A, Nele Dammeier, Eva Auffenberg, Francesco Bedogni, Jürgen B Honegger, Holger Lerche, Thomas V Wuttke and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. CulturedBrain communications · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Common AAV gene therapy vectors show nonselective transduction ofMolecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Niklas SchwarzDepartment of Neurology and Epileptology, Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Ulrike B S HedrichDepartment of Neurology and Epileptology, Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Hannah SchwarzDepartment of Neurology and Epileptology, Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Harshad P ADepartment of Neurology and Epileptology, Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Nele DammeierDepartment of Neurology and Epileptology, Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Eva AuffenbergDepartment of Neurology and Epileptology, Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Francesco BedogniSan Raffaele Rett Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132, Milan, Italy.
Jürgen B HoneggerDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Holger LercheDepartment of Neurology and Epileptology, Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Thomas V WuttkeDepartment of Neurology and Epileptology, Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Henner KochDepartment of Neurology and Epileptology, Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany. henner.koch@uni-tuebingen.de.
Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research · DEUniversity of Tübingen · DESan Raffaele University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pathophysiological investigation of CNS-related diseases, such as epilepsy or neurodegenerative disorders, largely relies on histological studies on human post mortem tissue, tissue obtained by biopsy or resective surgery and on studies using disease models including animal models, heterologous expression systems or cell culture based approaches. However, in general it remains elusive to what extent results obtained in model systems can be directly translated to the human brain, calling for strategies allowing validation or even primary investigation in live human CNS tissue. In the work reported here, we prepared human organotypic slice cultures from access tissue of resective epilepsy surgery. Employing different culture conditions, we systematically compared artificial culturing media versus human cerbrospinal fluid (hCSF) obtained from patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH). Presented data demonstrates sustained cortical neuronal survival including not only maintenance of typical cellular electrophysiological properties and activity, such as robust action potential generation and synaptic connectivity, but also preservation of tonic and phasic network activity up to several weeks in vitro. As clearly delineated by immunocytochemistry, single cell patch clamp and extracellular recordings, we find that in contrast to artificial culturing media, hCSF significantly enhances neuron viability and maintenance of network activity.

Indexed as

AutopsyCell SurvivalCerebral CortexCerebrospinal FluidCulture MediaHumansNeuronsOrgan Culture TechniquesPathologyCulture Media

Identifiers

PMID28947761
PMCPMC5613008
OpenAlexW2757189751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.