Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28947736›Full record

ArticleNature communications2017

Genetic and epigenetic features direct differential efficiency of Xist-mediated silencing at X-chromosomal and autosomal locations.

Agnese Loda, Johannes H Brandsma, Ivaylo Vassilev, Nicolas Servant, Friedemann Loos, Azadeh Amirnasr, Erik Splinter, Emmanuel Barillot, Raymond A Poot, Edith Heard and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Genome research · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. eLife · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Modeling specific aneuploidies: from karyotype manipulations to biological insights.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The Molecular and Nuclear Dynamics of X-Chromosome Inactivation.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Agnese LodaDepartment of Developmental Biology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Wytemaweg 80, 3015 CN, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8109-128X
Johannes H BrandsmaDepartment of Cell Biology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Wytemaweg 80, 3015 CN, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Ivaylo VassilevBioinformatics and Computational Systems Biology of Cancer, INSERM U900, Paris, 75005, France.
Nicolas ServantBioinformatics and Computational Systems Biology of Cancer, INSERM U900, Paris, 75005, France.
Friedemann LoosEquipe 11 labellisée par la Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Paris, 75006, France.
Azadeh AmirnasrDepartment of Developmental Biology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Wytemaweg 80, 3015 CN, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erik SplinterCergentis B.V., Padualaan 8, 3584 CH, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Emmanuel BarillotBioinformatics and Computational Systems Biology of Cancer, INSERM U900, Paris, 75005, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2724-2002
Raymond A PootDepartment of Cell Biology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Wytemaweg 80, 3015 CN, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Edith HeardMammalian Developmental Epigenetics group, Institut Curie, CNRS UMR 3215, INSERM, U934, Paris, France.
Joost GribnauDepartment of Developmental Biology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Wytemaweg 80, 3015 CN, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. j.gribnau@erasmusmc.nl.
Erasmus MC · NLInserm · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRCentre de Recherche des Cordeliers · FRCergentis (Netherlands) · NL

Funding

European Research Council ERC 260587
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Xist is indispensable for X chromosome inactivation. However, how Xist RNA directs chromosome-wide silencing and why some regions are more efficiently silenced than others remains unknown. Here, we explore the function of Xist by inducing ectopic Xist expression from multiple different X-linked and autosomal loci in mouse aneuploid and female diploid embryonic stem cells in which Xist-mediated silencing does not lead to lethal functional monosomy. We show that ectopic Xist expression faithfully recapitulates endogenous X chromosome inactivation from any location on the X chromosome, whereas long-range silencing of autosomal genes is less efficient. Long interspersed elements facilitate inactivation of genes located far away from the Xist transcription locus, and genes escaping X chromosome inactivation show enrichment of CTCF on X chromosomal but not autosomal loci. Our findings highlight important genomic and epigenetic features acquired during sex chromosome evolution to facilitate an efficient X chromosome inactivation process.Xist RNA is required for X chromosome inactivation but it is not well understood how Xist silences some regions more efficiently than others. Here, the authors induce ectopic Xist expression from multiple different X-linked and autosomal loci in cells to explore Xist function.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAnimalsCCCTC-Binding FactorCell DifferentiationEmbryonic Stem CellsGene SilencingLong Interspersed Nucleotide ElementsMiceRNA, Long NoncodingX Chromosome InactivationCCCTC-Binding FactorCtcf protein, mouseRNA, Long NoncodingXIST non-coding RNA

Identifiers

PMID28947736
PMCPMC5612955
OpenAlexW2755670047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.