Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28947657›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2017

Human X chromosome inactivation and reactivation: implications for cell reprogramming and disease.

Irene Cantone, Amanda G Fisher

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Horse Clinical Cytogenetics: Recurrent Themes and Novel Findings.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Review
  12. Biological Function of Long Non-coding RNA (LncRNA) Xist.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Sex differences in cancer mechanisms.Biology of sex differences · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. How Does Reprogramming to Pluripotency Affect Genomic Imprinting?Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Irene CantoneLymphocyte Development, MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences (LMS), Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK.
Amanda G FisherLymphocyte Development, MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences (LMS), Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK amanda.fisher@lms.mrc.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3010-3644
MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U120027516
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) is an exemplar of epigenetic regulation that is set up as pluripotent cells differentiate. Once established, XCI is stably propagated, but can be reversed

Indexed as

Cellular ReprogrammingAnimalsCell LineChromosomes, Human, XEmbryonic Stem CellsFemaleFibroblastsGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMiceRNA, Long NoncodingX Chromosome InactivationRNA, Long Noncodingcell reprogrammingepigeneticgene reactivationhuman X-chromosome inactivation

Identifiers

PMID28947657
PMCPMC5627160
OpenAlexW2758290500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.