ArticleBMJ open2017
Youth friendliness in mental health and addiction services: protocol for a scoping review.
Article in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Experiences and satisfaction of children, young people and their parents with alternative mental health models to inpatient settings: a systematic review.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2020Pooled it
- A qualitative study exploring youth's experiences of hospital- and integrated community-based mental health services: the YouthCan IMPACT initiative.BMC psychiatry · 2025Trial
- Intensive outpatient interventions for youth with complex mental illness: a scoping review protocol.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Defining youth-centred practice in mental health care.BMC psychiatry · 2025Article
- Co-creators, not bystanders: Advancing meaningful youth engagement in antimicrobial resistance response in Africa.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Benefits, barriers and recommendations for youth engagement in health research: combining evidence-based and youth perspectives.Research involvement and engagement · 2024Review
- Research- and health-related youth advisory groups in Canada: An environmental scan with stakeholder interviews.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021Review
- What makes mental health and substance use services youth friendly? A scoping review of literature.BMC health services research · 2019Article
- Engaging youth in research planning, design and execution: Practical recommendations for researchers.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2018Review
- Youth engagement in the YouthCan IMPACT trial.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTo better reach youth in need of mental health and addiction (MHA) services, there is increasing emphasis on making MHA services 'youth friendly.' However, it is unclear what youth friendliness means on a practical level. This scoping review explores (1) how youth friendliness in mental health services is defined in the literature, (2) what characteristics make MHA services youth friendly and (3) how youth friendliness is expected to impact service use by young people.
methodsA search will be conducted of eight electronic bibliographic databases over the last 15 years (2002-2017) to identify literature on youth friendliness consistent with the modern youth experience. Grey literature will also be searched. The search and literature selection process will include all study designs, as well as non-research literature. Two independent raters will determine eligibility based on a review of the titles and abstracts of the identified literature, followed by full text reviews when required. Data will be extracted from the identified literature and then synthesised using qualitative and quantitative approaches. As a final step, we will conduct stakeholder consultations with youth, family members and service provider groups to validate the findings and identify any characteristics of youth friendliness that they deem important that were not reported in the findings. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Results will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication, as well as international, national and local conference presentations. Agency reports will be developed to present the findings in a user-friendly format, including a youth-friendliness checklist for youth-serving organisations. Research ethics approval has been obtained for the consultation component of this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.