Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28946936›Full record

Observational studyEpidemiology and infection2018

Development of prediction models for upper and lower respiratory and gastrointestinal tract infections using social network parameters in middle-aged and older persons -The Maastricht Study.

S Brinkhues, S M J van Kuijk, C J P A Hoebe, P H M Savelkoul, M E E Kretzschmar, M W J Jansen, N de Vries, S J S Sep, P C Dagnelie, N C Schaper and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Epidemiology and infection, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

S BrinkhuesDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands.
S M J van KuijkDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands.
C J P A HoebeDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands.
P H M SavelkoulDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands.
M E E KretzschmarUniversity Medical Centre Utrecht, Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
M W J JansenDepartment of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
N de VriesFaculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
S J S SepDepartment of Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands.
P C DagnelieCAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
N C SchaperCAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
F R J VerheyAlzheimer Centre Limburg, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
H BosmaCAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
J MaesHuis voor de Zorg, Sittard, The Netherlands.
M T SchramDepartment of Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands.
N H T M Dukers-MuijrersDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Maastricht University · NLMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLGGD Zuid Limburg · NLHuis voor de Zorg · NLNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to predict upper respiratory infections (URI), lower respiratory infections (LRI), and gastrointestinal tract infections (GI) in independently living older persons would greatly benefit population and individual health. Social network parameters have so far not been included in prediction models. Data were obtained from The Maastricht Study, a population-based cohort study (N = 3074, mean age (±s.d.) 59.8 ± 8.3, 48.8% women). We used multivariable logistic regression analysis to develop prediction models for self-reported symptomatic URI, LRI, and GI (past 2 months). We determined performance of the models by quantifying measures of discriminative ability and calibration. Overall, 953 individuals (31.0%) reported URI, 349 (11.4%) LRI, and 380 (12.4%) GI. The area under the curve was 64.7% (95% confidence interval (CI) 62.6-66.8%) for URI, 71.1% (95% CI 68.4-73.8) for LRI, and 64.2% (95% CI 61.3-67.1%) for GI. All models had good calibration (based on visual inspection of calibration plot, and Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test). Social network parameters were strong predictors for URI, LRI, and GI. Using social network parameters in prediction models for URI, LRI, and GI seems highly promising. Such parameters may be used as potential determinants that can be addressed in a practical intervention in older persons, or in a predictive tool to compute an individual's probability of infections.

Indexed as

Social NetworkingAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGastrointestinal DiseasesHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedModels, TheoreticalNetherlandsProspective StudiesRespiratory Tract Infectionsgastrointestinal tract infectionspredictionRespiratory tract infectionssocial networks

Identifiers

PMID28946936
PMCPMC5892426
OpenAlexW2756770702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.