Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28946855›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2017

An intervention strategy for improving residential environment and positive mental health among public housing tenants: rationale, design and methods of Flash on my neighborhood!

Janie Houle, Simon Coulombe, Stephanie Radziszewski, Xavier Leloup, Thomas Saïas, Juan Torres, Paul Morin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Janie HouleDepartment of Psychology, Université du Québec à Montréal, C.P. 8888, succ. Centre-ville, Montréal, Québec, H3C 3P8, Canada. houle.janie@uqam.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-0370-5076
Simon CoulombeDepartment of Psychology, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Canada.
Stephanie RadziszewskiDepartment of Psychology, Université du Québec à Montréal, C.P. 8888, succ. Centre-ville, Montréal, Québec, H3C 3P8, Canada.
Xavier LeloupInstitut national de la recherche scientifique, Centre Urbanisation Culture Société, Montreal, Canada.
Thomas SaïasDepartment of Psychology, Université du Québec à Montréal, C.P. 8888, succ. Centre-ville, Montréal, Québec, H3C 3P8, Canada.
Juan TorresUrban planning, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
Paul MorinSocial Work, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Canada, public housing programs are an important part of governmental strategies to fight poverty and public exclusion. The Flash on my neighborhood! project is a four-year multiphase community-based participatory action research strategy currently implemented in six public housing developments (n = 1009 households) across the province of Québec, Canada. The goal is to reduce the mental health disparities faced by these public housing tenants compared to the general population, while identifying which environmental and policy changes are needed to turn public housing settings into healthier environments.

methodsThe protocol involves three successive, interconnected phases: 1) Strengths and needs assessment, including community outreach and recruitment of tenants to collaborate as peer researchers, an exploratory qualitative component (photovoice), a systematic neighborhood observation, and a household survey; 2) Action plan development, including a community forum and interactive capacity-building and discussion sessions; 3) Action plan implementation and monitoring. The entire intervention is evaluated using a mixed-method design, framed within a multiple case study perspective. Throughout the project and particularly in the evaluation phase, data will be collected to record a) contextual factors (tenants' previous experience of participation, history of public housing development, etc.); b) activities that took place and elements from the action plan that were implemented; and c) short- and medium-term outcomes (objective and perceived improvements in the quality of the residential setting, both physically and in terms of mental health and social capital). DISCUSSION: The study will provide unprecedented evidence-based information on the key ingredients of a collective intervention process associated with the increased collective empowerment and positive mental health of public housing tenants.

Indexed as

Public HousingSocial EnvironmentHealth PromotionHealth Status DisparitiesHumansMental DisordersProgram EvaluationProspective StudiesQuebecResidence CharacteristicsEmpowerment interventionPlace-based intervention strategyPositive mental healthPublic housingResidential environment

Identifiers

PMID28946855
PMCPMC5613323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.