Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28946851›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2017

Factors determining satisfaction among facility-based maternity clients in Nepal.

Suresh Mehata, Yuba Raj Paudel, Maureen Dariang, Krishna Kumar Aryal, Susan Paudel, Ranju Mehta, Stuart King, Sarah Barnett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Psychometric Evaluation of the Malay Version of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ-My).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Suresh MehataNepal Health Sector Support Program, Ministry of Health and Population, Ramshaha Path, GPO Box: 7830, Kathmandu, 44600, Nepal. sureshmht@gmail.com.
Yuba Raj PaudelNepal Health Sector Support Program, Ministry of Health and Population, Ramshaha Path, GPO Box: 7830, Kathmandu, 44600, Nepal.
Maureen DariangNepal Health Sector Support Program, Ministry of Health and Population, Ramshaha Path, GPO Box: 7830, Kathmandu, 44600, Nepal.
Krishna Kumar AryalNepal Health Research Council, Ministry of Health and Population, Kathmandu, 44600, Nepal.
Susan PaudelInstitute of Medicine Tribhuvan University Maharajgunj, Kathmandu, 4600, Nepal.
Ranju MehtaInstitute of Medicine Tribhuvan University Maharajgunj, Kathmandu, 4600, Nepal.
Stuart KingNepal Health Sector Support Program, Ministry of Health and Population, Ramshaha Path, GPO Box: 7830, Kathmandu, 44600, Nepal.
Sarah BarnettOptions Consultancy Services Limited, Devon House, 58 St Katharine's Way, London, E1W1LB, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith an increasing number of institutional deliveries, the Nepalese health system faces a challenge to ensure a quality of service provision. This paper aims to identify the determinants of client satisfaction with maternity care in Nepal using data from a nationally representative health facility survey.

methodsA total of 447 exit interviews, with women who had either recently delivered or who had experienced obstetric complications, were conducted across 13 districts in Nepal (87% in hospitals, 8% in Primary Health Care Centres (PHCCs), and 5% in Sub/Health Posts(S/HPs). Client satisfaction was measured using an eight item scale that covered accessibility, interpersonal communication, physical environment, technical aspect of care and decision making. A client satisfaction index was computed using ordinal principal component analysis. A multivariate probit model was used to assess the net effect of explanatory variables on client satisfaction.

resultsLonger waiting times and overcrowding increased the likelihood of dissatisfaction. Having an opportunity to ask questions was positively associated with client satisfaction. Respondents from hill districts and rural areas were more likely to be satisfied in comparison to respondents from mountain, terai and urban areas. Socio-demographic factors (age, parity, caste/ethnicity, education, and ecological zone) and supply side factors (the time taken to reach a facility, type of facility, payment for services, and unknown heath worker or anyone entering the delivery room) were not statistically associated with satisfaction.

conclusionsThe findings suggest client satisfaction with the quality of maternity services in Nepal could be improved by reducing waiting times and overcrowding, and giving the mothers adequate time to ask questions. If clients are more satisfied they are more likely to use the facility again/recommend to a friend.

Indexed as

Patient SatisfactionQuality of Health CareAdultBreast FeedingCommunicationCrowdingDecision MakingDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHealth FacilitiesHealth Facility EnvironmentHealth Services AccessibilityHumansNepalPregnancyProfessional-Patient RelationsClient satisfactionMaternity careNepalQuality of careUtilisation

Identifiers

PMID28946851
PMCPMC5613378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.