Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28946652›Full record

ReviewBrain sciences2017

Changes in Cognition and Decision Making Capacity Following Brain Tumour Resection: Illustrated with Two Cases.

Katie Veretennikoff, David Walker, Vivien Biggs, Gail Robinson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06805578 (Exploring and Evaluating the Impact of 'Refresh and Reconnect!'), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06805578 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Exploring and Evaluating the Impact of 'Refresh and Reconnect!': A Museum-based Heritage Programme for Older Persons With Cognitive Impairment

TypeinterventionalSponsorDuke-NUS Graduate Medical SchoolRan2025 to 2026Enrolled108ConditionsMild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), Ageing, Mild Dementia, Well-beingArmsHeritage art programme
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Extracellular Matrix and Biocompatible Materials in Glioblastoma Treatment.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Katie VeretennikoffNeuropsychology Research Unit, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia. katie.veretennikoff@uqconnect.edu.au.
David WalkerBrizBrain and Spine, The Wesley Hospital, Brisbane 4066, Australia. dwalker@brizbrain.com.au.
Vivien BiggsBrizBrain and Spine, The Wesley Hospital, Brisbane 4066, Australia. vivienb@brizbrain.com.au.
Gail RobinsonNeuropsychology Research Unit, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia. g.robinson@psy.uq.edu.au.
University of Queensland · AUWesley Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Changes in cognition, behaviour and emotion frequently occur in patients with primary and secondary brain tumours. This impacts the ability to make considered decisions, especially following surgical resection, which is often overlooked in the management of patients. Moreover, the impact of cognitive deficits on decision making ability affects activities of daily living and functional independence. The assessment process to ascertain decision making capacity remains a matter of debate. One avenue for evaluating a patient's ability to make informed decisions in the context of brain tumour resection is neuropsychological assessment. This involves the assessment of a wide range of cognitive abilities on standard measurement tools, providing a robust approach to ascertaining capacity. Evidence has shown that a comprehensive and tailored neuropsychological assessment has greater sensitivity than brief cognitive screening tools to detect subtle and/or specific cognitive deficits in brain tumours. It is the precise nature and severity of any cognitive deficits that determines any implications for decision making capacity. This paper focuses on cognitive deficits and decision making capacity following surgical resection of both benign and malignant, and primary and secondary brain tumours in adult patients, and the implications for patients' ability to consent to future medical treatment and make decisions related to everyday activities.

Indexed as

brain tumourscapacitycognitiondecision makingneuropsychology

Identifiers

PMID28946652
PMCPMC5664049
OpenAlexW2759029998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.