Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28945882›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2017

Extensive Genetic Differentiation between Homomorphic Sex Chromosomes in the Mosquito Vector, Aedes aegypti.

Albin Fontaine, Igor Filipovic, Thanyalak Fansiri, Ary A Hoffmann, Changde Cheng, Mark Kirkpatrick, Gordana Rašic, Louis Lambrechts

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Differential elimination of marked sex chromosomes enables production of nontransgenic male mosquitoes in a single strain.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A Conserved Female-Specific Requirement for thePathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Disagreement in FMolecular ecology resources · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Albin FontaineDepartment of Genomes and Genetics, Insect-Virus Interactions Group, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France.
Igor FilipovicPest and Environmental Adaptation Research Group, School of BioSciences and Bio21 Institute, Faculty of Science, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Thanyalak FansiriDepartment of Entomology, Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Bangkok, Thailand.
Ary A HoffmannPest and Environmental Adaptation Research Group, School of BioSciences and Bio21 Institute, Faculty of Science, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Changde ChengDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Texas, Austin.
Mark KirkpatrickDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Texas, Austin.
Gordana RašicPest and Environmental Adaptation Research Group, School of BioSciences and Bio21 Institute, Faculty of Science, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Louis LambrechtsDepartment of Genomes and Genetics, Insect-Virus Interactions Group, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France.

Funding

Genomic causes and consequences of sexually antagonistic selectionR01GM116853 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI KIRKPATRICK, MARK · 2015 to 2022
$3.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM116853
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanisms and evolutionary dynamics of sex-determination systems are of particular interest in insect vectors of human pathogens like mosquitoes because novel control strategies aim to convert pathogen-transmitting females into nonbiting males, or rely on accurate sexing for the release of sterile males. In Aedes aegypti, the main vector of dengue and Zika viruses, sex determination is governed by a dominant male-determining locus, previously thought to reside within a small, nonrecombining, sex-determining region (SDR) of an otherwise homomorphic sex chromosome. Here, we provide evidence that sex chromosomes in Ae. aegypti are genetically differentiated between males and females over a region much larger than the SDR. Our linkage mapping intercrosses failed to detect recombination between X and Y chromosomes over a 123-Mbp region (40% of their physical length) containing the SDR. This region of reduced male recombination overlapped with a smaller 63-Mbp region (20% of the physical length of the sex chromosomes) displaying high male-female genetic differentiation in unrelated wild populations from Brazil and Australia and in a reference laboratory strain originating from Africa. In addition, the sex-differentiated genomic region was associated with a significant excess of male-to-female heterozygosity and contained a small cluster of loci consistent with Y-specific null alleles. We demonstrate that genetic differentiation between sex chromosomes is sufficient to assign individuals to their correct sex with high accuracy. We also show how data on allele frequency differences between sexes can be used to estimate linkage disequilibrium between loci and the sex-determining locus. Our discovery of large-scale genetic differentiation between sex chromosomes in Ae. aegypti lays a new foundation for mapping and population genomic studies, as well as for mosquito control strategies targeting the sex-determination pathway.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, InsectSex ChromosomesAedesAnimalsGenes, InsectGenetic DriftGenetic LinkageGenetic LociGenome, InsectRecombination, GeneticSex CharacteristicsAedes aegyptiRAD markerssex chromosomesex-linked allelesWGS

Identifiers

PMID28945882
PMCPMC5737474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.