Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28945877›Full record

ReviewAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2017

Incorporating BEAMing technology as a liquid biopsy into clinical practice for the management of colorectal cancer patients: an expert taskforce review.

J García-Foncillas, E Alba, E Aranda, E Díaz-Rubio, R López-López, J Tabernero, A Vivancos

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

J García-FoncillasCancer Institute, University Hospital Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, Autonomous University, Madrid.
E AlbaMedical Oncology Unit, Regional University Hospital Virgen de la Victoria, IBIMA, Málaga.
E ArandaBiomedical Research Institute (IMIBIC), Hospital Reina Sofía, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Córdoba, Cordoba, Spain (CIBERONC).
E Díaz-RubioResearch Institute IdISSC, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain (CIBERONC).
R López-LópezMedical Oncology Department and Translational Medical Oncology Group, University Clinical Hospital & Health Research Institute (IDIS); CIBERONC, Santiago de Compostela, University School of Medicine, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
J TaberneroMedical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAM), Barcelona, Spain (CIBERONC).
A VivancosVall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Cancer Genomics Lab., Barcelona, Spain.
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer · ESHospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz · ESInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga · ESUniversity of Córdoba · ESVall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The importance of mutation identification for advanced colorectal cancer treatment with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor agents is well established. However, due to delays in turnaround time, low-quality tissue samples, and/or lack of standardization of testing methods a significant proportion of patients are being treated without the information that Kirsten rat sarcoma and neuroblastoma rat sarcoma (RAS) testing can provide. The detection of mutated circulating tumor DNA by BEAMing technology addresses this gap in care and allows these patients to receive international guideline-recommended expanded RAS testing with rapid turnaround times. Furthermore, the overall concordance between OncoBEAM RAS colorectal cancer testing and standard of care tissue testing is very high (93.3%). This article presents an overview of the clinical utility and potential applications of this minimally invasive method, such as early detection of emergent resistance to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy. If appropriately implemented, BEAMing technology holds considerable promise to enhance the quality of patient care and improve clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNAColorectal NeoplasmsHumansLiquid BiopsyBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNAcolorectal cancerEGFRliquid biopsymutation testingtumor resistance

Identifiers

PMID28945877
PMCPMC5834030
OpenAlexW2753099250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.