Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28945862›Full record

ArticleSystematic biology2018

Conflicting Evolutionary Histories of the Mitochondrial and Nuclear Genomes in New World Myotis Bats.

Roy N Platt, Brant C Faircloth, Kevin A M Sullivan, Troy J Kieran, Travis C Glenn, Michael W Vandewege, Thomas E Lee, Robert J Baker, Richard D Stevens, David A Ray

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Mitogenomics inMicrobial genomics · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. The complete mitochondrial genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The complete mitochondrial genome of Steppe Whiskered Bat (Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. First record of disk-footed batZoological research · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Roy N PlattDepartment of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University, 2901 Main St, Lubbock, TX, USA.
Brant C FairclothDepartment of Biological Sciences and Museum of Natural Science, Louisiana State University, 202 Life Science Building, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.
Kevin A M SullivanDepartment of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University, 2901 Main St, Lubbock, TX, USA.
Troy J KieranDepartment of Environmental Health Science, University of Georgia, 206 Environmental Health Sciences Building, Athens, GA, USA.
Travis C GlennDepartment of Environmental Health Science, University of Georgia, 206 Environmental Health Sciences Building, Athens, GA, USA.
Michael W VandewegeDepartment of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University, 2901 Main St, Lubbock, TX, USA.
Thomas E LeeDepartment of Biology, Abilene Christian University, 1600 Campus Ct. Abilene, TX, USA.
Robert J BakerDepartment of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University, 2901 Main St, Lubbock, TX, USA.
Richard D StevensNatural Resource Management, Texas Tech University, 2901 Main St, Lubbock, TX, USA.
David A RayDepartment of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University, 2901 Main St, Lubbock, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid diversification of Myotis bats into more than 100 species is one of the most extensive mammalian radiations available for study. Efforts to understand relationships within Myotis have primarily utilized mitochondrial markers and trees inferred from nuclear markers lacked resolution. Our current understanding of relationships within Myotis is therefore biased towards a set of phylogenetic markers that may not reflect the history of the nuclear genome. To resolve this, we sequenced the full mitochondrial genomes of 37 representative Myotis, primarily from the New World, in conjunction with targeted sequencing of 3648 ultraconserved elements (UCEs). We inferred the phylogeny and explored the effects of concatenation and summary phylogenetic methods, as well as combinations of markers based on informativeness or levels of missing data, on our results. Of the 294 phylogenies generated from the nuclear UCE data, all are significantly different from phylogenies inferred using mitochondrial genomes. Even within the nuclear data, quartet frequencies indicate that around half of all UCE loci conflict with the estimated species tree. Several factors can drive such conflict, including incomplete lineage sorting, introgressive hybridization, or even phylogenetic error. Despite the degree of discordance between nuclear UCE loci and the mitochondrial genome and among UCE loci themselves, the most common nuclear topology is recovered in one quarter of all analyses with strong nodal support. Based on these results, we re-examine the evolutionary history of Myotis to better understand the phenomena driving their unique nuclear, mitochondrial, and biogeographic histories.

Indexed as

PhylogenyAnimalsChiropteraGenomeGenome, Mitochondrial

Identifiers

PMID28945862
PMCPMC5837689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.