Trial reportAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2017
Validation of a new prognostic model to easily predict outcome in renal cell carcinoma: the GRANT score applied to the ASSURE trial population.
Trial report in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT00326898 (ASSURE), which is not on this map. Cited by 45 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
ASSURE: Adjuvant Sorafenib or Sunitinib for Unfavorable Renal Carcinoma
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.
- A prospective external validation of the GRade, Age, Nodes and Tumor score in the ECOG-ACRIN EA8143 PROSPER trial.The oncologist · 2026Trial
- External Validation of the 2003 Leibovich Prognostic Score in Patients Randomly Assigned to SORCE, an International Phase III Trial of Adjuvant Sorafenib in Renal Cell Cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2022Trial
- External Validation of Prognostic Models for Nonmetastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma in a Japanese Cohort: Evaluation of Predictive Performance.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2026Article
- Review
- DaRenCa risk score: A prognostic model for recurrence in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.BJUI compass · 2026Article
- Tumor-informed ctDNA surveillance after radical nephrectomy and level IV IVC thrombectomy for clear cell renal cell carcinoma: Early detection of molecular residual disease.Urology case reports · 2026Article
- Clinicopathological-based nomogram prediction and molecular characterization of postoperative recurrence in clinical T1 clear cell renal cell carcinoma.BMC surgery · 2025Article
- Prognostic Value of B7-H3 and a Novel Scoring System in Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Survival improvement over time in renal cell carcinoma treated with nephrectomy: A longitudinal propensity score-matched study.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2025Article
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of belzutifan versus everolimus for previously treated advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma in the United States and China.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2025Article
- Prognostic value of the GRANT score and development of a nomogram in papillary renal cell carcinoma: a SEER-based study with external validation in a Chinese cohort.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Longitudinal Testing of Circulating Tumor DNA in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.JCO precision oncology · 2024Article
- Predicting Recurrence After Radical Surgery for High-Risk Renal Cell Carcinoma: Development and Internal Validation of the "TOWARDS" Score.Annals of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Gross Hematuria Does not Affect the Selection of Nephrectomy Types for Clinical Stage 1 Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Multicenter, Retrospective Cohort Study.Annals of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- UroPredict: Machine learning model on real-world data for prediction of kidney cancer recurrence (UroCCR-120).NPJ precision oncology · 2024Article
- Prognostic Value of the Lung Immune Prognostic Index on Recurrence after Radical Surgery for High-Risk Renal Cell Carcinoma.Cancers · 2024Article
- Patients with high nuclear grade pT1-ccRCC are more suitable for radical nephrectomy than partial nephrectomy: a multicenter retrospective study using propensity score.World journal of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Retrospective Multicenter Analysis of Prognostic Risk Factors for One Year Recurrence in Patient With Renal Cell Carcinoma After Partial or Radical Nephrectomy: Results of Korean Renal Cancer Study Group (KRoCS) Database.Journal of Korean medical science · 2024Article
- Validation and comparison of prognostic value of different preoperative systemic inflammation indices in non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma.International urology and nephrology · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Prognostic scores have been developed to estimate the risk of recurrence and the probability of survival after nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The use of these tools, despite being helpful to plan a customized schedule of follow-up, to the patient's tailored counselling and to select individuals who could potentially benefit from adjuvant treatment, currently is not routine, due to their relative complexity and to the lack of histological data (i.e. necrosis). Patients and methods: We developed a simple score called GRade, Age, Nodes and Tumor (GRANT) based on four easily obtained parameters: Fuhrman grade, age, pathological nodal status and pathological tumor size. Patients with 0 or 1 factor are classified as favorable risk, whereas patients with two or more risk factors as unfavorable risk. The large population of RCC patients from the ASSURE adjuvant trial was used as independent dataset for this external validation, to investigate the prognostic value of the new score in terms of disease-free survival and overall survival and to evaluate its possible application as predictive tool. Statistical analyses were carried out by the Department of Biostatistics & Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (Boston, USA) for the ASSURE trial patients' population. Results: The performance of the new model is similar to that of the already validated score systems, but its strength, compared with the others already available, is the ease and clarity of its calculation, with great speed of use during the clinical practice. Limitations are the use of the Fuhrman nuclear grade, not valid for rare histologies, and the TNM classification modifications over time. Conclusion: The GRANT score demonstrated its potential usefulness for clinical practice. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier for the ASSURE trial: NCT00326898.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.