ArticleAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2017
Prognostic value of sequencing-based minimal residual disease detection in patients with multiple myeloma who underwent autologous stem-cell transplantation.
Article in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- Minimal Residual Disease Negativity Does Not Overcome Poor Prognosis in High-Risk Multiple Myeloma: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia · 2020Trial
- Trial
- Measurable residual disease assessment in apheresis product from multiple myeloma patients: Correlation with biology, depth of response and survival.British journal of haematology · 2026Article
- Toward a cure for multiple myeloma within a decade.Blood cancer journal · 2026Review
- Article
- A Risk Stratification System in Myeloma Patients with Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation.Cancers · 2024Article
- Review
- Review
- Article
- Minimal residual disease status improved the response evaluation in patients with Waldenström's macroglobulinemia.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
- Next-generation sequencing for MRD monitoring in B-lineage malignancies: from bench to bedside.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2022Review
- Guest Editorial: Innovation will be a bridge to cure in patients with multiple myeloma?International journal of hematology · 2022Article
- Minimal residual disease detection by next-generation sequencing in multiple myeloma: Promise and challenges for response-adapted therapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Exploration of residual disease in stem cell products from mantle cell lymphoma using next-generation sequencing.Leukemia research reports · 2022Article
- Comparison of minimal residual disease detection in multiple myeloma between the DuraClone and EuroFlow methods.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Routine Evaluation of Minimal Residual Disease in Myeloma Using Next-Generation Sequencing Clonality Testing: Feasibility, Challenges, and Direct Comparison with High-Sensitivity Flow Cytometry.The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD · 2021Article
- Review
- Stem Cell Mobilization and Autograft Minimal Residual Disease Negativity with Novel Induction Regimens in Multiple Myeloma.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2020Article
- Clinical value of measurable residual disease testing for multiple myeloma and implementation in Japan.International journal of hematology · 2020Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
20 authors at 13 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMost patients with multiple myeloma (MM) are considered to be incurable, and relapse owing to minimal residual disease (MRD) is the main cause of death among these patients. Therefore, new technologies to assess deeper response are required. PATIENTS AND
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 125 patients with MM who underwent high-dose melphalan plus autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) to detect MRD in autograft/bone marrow (BM) cells using a next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based method and allele-specific oligonucleotide-polymerase chain reaction (ASO-PCR).
resultsNGS-based method was applicable to 90% and this method had at least one to two logs greater sensitivity compared to ASO-PCR. MRD negative by NGS [MRDNGS(-)] (defined as <10-6) in post-ASCT BM cases (n = 26) showed a significantly better progression-free survival (PFS) (96% at 4 years, P < 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (100% at 4 years, P =0.04) than MRDNGS(+) in post-ASCT BM cases (n = 25). When restricting the analysis to the 39 complete response cases, patients who were MRDNGS(-) (n = 24) showed a significantly better PFS than those that were MRDNGS(+) (n = 15) (P =0.02). Moreover, MRDNGS(-) in post-ASCT BM cases (n = 12) showed significantly a better PFS than MRDNGS(+) cases (n = 7) where MRD was not detected by ASO-PCR (P = 0.001). Patients whose autografts were negative by NGS-based MRD assessment (<10-7) (n = 19) had 92% PFS and 100% OS at 4 years post-ASCT. Conversely, the NGS-based MRD positive patients who received post-ASCT treatment using novel agents (n = 49) had a significantly better PFS (P = 0.001) and tended to have a better OS (P= 0.214) than those that were untreated (n = 33).
conclusionsLow level MRD detected by NGS-based platform but not ASO-PCR has significant prognostic value when assessing either the autograft product or BM cells post-ASCT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.