Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28945767›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Chorioamnionitis following preterm premature rupture of membranes and fetal heart rate variability.

Laurent Vandenbroucke, Matthieu Doyen, Maëla Le Lous, Alain Beuchée, Philippe Loget, Guy Carrault, Patrick Pladys

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Laurent VandenbrouckeINSERM, UMR1099, Signal and Image Processing Laboratory, SEPIA team, Rennes, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6079-3271
Matthieu DoyenINSERM, U1414, Clinical Investigation Center, Rennes, France.
Maëla Le LousCHU Rennes, Department of Obstetrics, University Hospital of Rennes, Rennes, France.
Alain BeuchéeINSERM, UMR1099, Signal and Image Processing Laboratory, SEPIA team, Rennes, France.
Philippe LogetCHU Rennes, Department of Anatomical Pathology, University Hospital of Rennes, Rennes, France.
Guy CarraultINSERM, UMR1099, Signal and Image Processing Laboratory, SEPIA team, Rennes, France.
Patrick PladysINSERM, UMR1099, Signal and Image Processing Laboratory, SEPIA team, Rennes, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe objective of this study was to identify prenatal markers of histological chorioamnionitis (HC) during pPROM using fetal computerized cardiotocography (cCTG). MATERIALS AND

methodsRetrospective review of medical records from pregnant women referred for pPROM between 26 and 34 weeks, in whom placental histology was available, in a tertiary level obstetric service over a 5-year period. Fetal heart rate variability was assessed using cCTG. Patients were included if they were monitored at least six times in the 72 hours preceding delivery. Clinical and biological cCTG parameters during the pPROM latency period were compared between cases with or without HC.

resultsIn total, 222 pPROM cases were observed, but cCTG data was available in only 23 of these cases (10 with and 13 without HC) after exclusion of co-morbidities which may potentially perturb fetal heart rate variability measures. Groups were comparable for maternal age, parity, gestational age at pPROM, pPROM duration and neonatal characteristics (p>0.1). Baseline fetal heart rate was higher in the HC group [median 147.3 bpm IQR (144.2-149.2) vs. 141.3 bpm (137.1-145.4) in no HC group; p = 0.02]. The number of low variation episodes [6.4, (3.5-15.3) vs. 2.3 (1-5.2); p = 0.04] was also higher in the HC group, whereas short term variations were lower in the HC group [7.1 ms (6-7.4) vs. 8.1 ms (7.4-9); p = 0.01] within 72 hours before delivery. Differences were especially discriminant within 24 hours before delivery, with less short-term variation [5 ms (3.7-5.9) vs. 7.8 ms (5.4-8.7); p = 0.007] and high variation episodes [3.9 (4.9-3.2) vs. 0.8 (1.5-0.2); p < 0.001] in the HC group.

conclusionThese results show differences in fetal heart rate variability, suggesting that cCTG could be used clinically to diagnoses chorioamnionitis during the pPROM latency period.

Indexed as

Heart Rate, FetalAdultBiomarkersCardiotocographyChorioamnionitisFemaleHumansPregnancyPremature Rupture of Fetal MembranesRetrospective StudiesBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID28945767
PMCPMC5612643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.