ArticlePloS one2017
Chorioamnionitis following preterm premature rupture of membranes and fetal heart rate variability.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Obstetric and Neonatal Outcomes Following Immediate Delivery Versus Expectant Management in Pregnant Women With Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes During the Late Preterm Period in Korea.Journal of Korean medical science · 2026Article
- Day-to-day dynamics of fetal heart rate variability to detect chorioamnionitis in preterm premature rupture of membranes.PloS one · 2025Article
- The role of interleukin-1 in perinatal inflammation and its impact on transitional circulation.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Review
- Effects of maternal ritodrine hydrochloride administration on the heart rate of preterm fetal sheep with intraamniotic inflammation.PloS one · 2022Article
- Autonomic development in preterm infants is associated with morbidity of prematurity.Pediatric research · 2022Article
- Stratified Management for Bacterial Infections in Late Preterm and Term Neonates: Current Strategies and Future Opportunities Toward Precision Medicine.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2021Review
- The fetal inflammatory response syndrome: the origins of a concept, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and obstetrical implications.Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine · 2020Article
- Necrotizing enterocolitis attenuates developmental heart rate variability increases in newborn rats.Neurogastroenterology and motility · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe objective of this study was to identify prenatal markers of histological chorioamnionitis (HC) during pPROM using fetal computerized cardiotocography (cCTG). MATERIALS AND
methodsRetrospective review of medical records from pregnant women referred for pPROM between 26 and 34 weeks, in whom placental histology was available, in a tertiary level obstetric service over a 5-year period. Fetal heart rate variability was assessed using cCTG. Patients were included if they were monitored at least six times in the 72 hours preceding delivery. Clinical and biological cCTG parameters during the pPROM latency period were compared between cases with or without HC.
resultsIn total, 222 pPROM cases were observed, but cCTG data was available in only 23 of these cases (10 with and 13 without HC) after exclusion of co-morbidities which may potentially perturb fetal heart rate variability measures. Groups were comparable for maternal age, parity, gestational age at pPROM, pPROM duration and neonatal characteristics (p>0.1). Baseline fetal heart rate was higher in the HC group [median 147.3 bpm IQR (144.2-149.2) vs. 141.3 bpm (137.1-145.4) in no HC group; p = 0.02]. The number of low variation episodes [6.4, (3.5-15.3) vs. 2.3 (1-5.2); p = 0.04] was also higher in the HC group, whereas short term variations were lower in the HC group [7.1 ms (6-7.4) vs. 8.1 ms (7.4-9); p = 0.01] within 72 hours before delivery. Differences were especially discriminant within 24 hours before delivery, with less short-term variation [5 ms (3.7-5.9) vs. 7.8 ms (5.4-8.7); p = 0.007] and high variation episodes [3.9 (4.9-3.2) vs. 0.8 (1.5-0.2); p < 0.001] in the HC group.
conclusionThese results show differences in fetal heart rate variability, suggesting that cCTG could be used clinically to diagnoses chorioamnionitis during the pPROM latency period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.