Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28945744›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2017

Relating dynamic brain states to dynamic machine states: Human and machine solutions to the speech recognition problem.

Cai Wingfield, Li Su, Xunying Liu, Chao Zhang, Phil Woodland, Andrew Thwaites, Elisabeth Fonteneau, William D Marslen-Wilson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Balancing Prediction and Sensory Input in Speech Comprehension: The Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Word Recognition in Context.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Cai WingfieldDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0254-199X
Li SuChina-UK Centre for Cognition and Ageing Research, Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
Xunying LiuDepartment of Systems Engineering and Engineering Management, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Chao ZhangDepartment of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Phil WoodlandDepartment of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Andrew ThwaitesDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6237-7140
Elisabeth FonteneauDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
William D Marslen-WilsonDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0690-6308
MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBChinese University of Hong Kong · HKSouthwest University · CN

Funding

Medical Research Council U.1055.04.002.00001.01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is widespread interest in the relationship between the neurobiological systems supporting human cognition and emerging computational systems capable of emulating these capacities. Human speech comprehension, poorly understood as a neurobiological process, is an important case in point. Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) systems with near-human levels of performance are now available, which provide a computationally explicit solution for the recognition of words in continuous speech. This research aims to bridge the gap between speech recognition processes in humans and machines, using novel multivariate techniques to compare incremental 'machine states', generated as the ASR analysis progresses over time, to the incremental 'brain states', measured using combined electro- and magneto-encephalography (EMEG), generated as the same inputs are heard by human listeners. This direct comparison of dynamic human and machine internal states, as they respond to the same incrementally delivered sensory input, revealed a significant correspondence between neural response patterns in human superior temporal cortex and the structural properties of ASR-derived phonetic models. Spatially coherent patches in human temporal cortex responded selectively to individual phonetic features defined on the basis of machine-extracted regularities in the speech to lexicon mapping process. These results demonstrate the feasibility of relating human and ASR solutions to the problem of speech recognition, and suggest the potential for further studies relating complex neural computations in human speech comprehension to the rapidly evolving ASR systems that address the same problem domain.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalNeural Networks, ComputerSpeech Recognition SoftwareAdultBrainElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMagnetoencephalographyMaleSpeech PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID28945744
PMCPMC5612454
OpenAlexW2953256171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.