Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28945704›Full record

ArticleNature methods2017

Comprehensive characterization of distinct states of human naive pluripotency generated by reprogramming.

Xiaodong Liu, Christian M Nefzger, Fernando J Rossello, Joseph Chen, Anja S Knaupp, Jaber Firas, Ethan Ford, Jahnvi Pflueger, Jacob M Paynter, Hun S Chy and 12 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature methods, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 105 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
105citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

105 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 171 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The making of cells and organs in xenogeneic animal bioreactor.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

45 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaodong LiuDepartment of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash University, Wellington Road, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Christian M NefzgerDepartment of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash University, Wellington Road, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Fernando J RosselloDepartment of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash University, Wellington Road, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3885-8777
Joseph ChenDepartment of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash University, Wellington Road, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Anja S KnauppDepartment of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash University, Wellington Road, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Jaber FirasDepartment of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash University, Wellington Road, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Ethan FordARC Center of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Jahnvi PfluegerARC Center of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Jacob M PaynterDepartment of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash University, Wellington Road, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Hun S ChyAustralian Regenerative Medicine Institute, Monash University, Wellington Road, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Carmel M O'BrienAustralian Regenerative Medicine Institute, Monash University, Wellington Road, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Cheng HuangDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Ketan MishraDepartment of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash University, Wellington Road, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Margeaux Hodgson-GarmsDepartment of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash University, Wellington Road, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Natasha JanszThe Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Sarah M WilliamsDepartment of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash University, Wellington Road, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Marnie E BlewittThe Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Susan K NilssonAustralian Regenerative Medicine Institute, Monash University, Wellington Road, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Ralf B SchittenhelmDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Andrew L LaslettAustralian Regenerative Medicine Institute, Monash University, Wellington Road, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Ryan ListerARC Center of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Jose M PoloDepartment of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash University, Wellington Road, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2531-778X
Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute · AUThe University of Western Australia · AUMonash University · AUThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent reports on the characteristics of naive human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) obtained using independent methods differ. Naive hPSCs have been mainly derived by conversion from primed hPSCs or by direct derivation from human embryos rather than by somatic cell reprogramming. To provide an unbiased molecular and functional reference, we derived genetically matched naive hPSCs by direct reprogramming of fibroblasts and by primed-to-naive conversion using different naive conditions (NHSM, RSeT, 5iLAF and t2iLGöY). Our results show that hPSCs obtained in these different conditions display a spectrum of naive characteristics. Furthermore, our characterization identifies KLF4 as sufficient for conversion of primed hPSCs into naive t2iLGöY hPSCs, underscoring the role that reprogramming factors can play for the derivation of bona fide naive hPSCs.

Indexed as

Cellular ReprogrammingCell DifferentiationFibroblastsGenomic InstabilityHumansKruppel-Like Factor 4Pluripotent Stem CellsKruppel-Like Factor 4

Identifiers

PMID28945704
OpenAlexW2758589426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.