Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28945421›Full record

ArticleAccounts of chemical research2017

Catalysts by Design: The Power of Theory.

Sharon Hammes-Schiffer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Accounts of chemical research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Chemical reviews · 2024
    Review
  3. Mechanism-Based Redesign of GAP to Activate Oncogenic Ras.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2023
    Article
  4. Review on Magnetism in Catalysis: From Theory to PEMFC Applications ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Enhancing computational enzyme design by a maximum entropy strategy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Application of Q2MM to predictions in stereoselective synthesis.Chemical communications (Cambridge, England) · 2018
    Article
  15. Keeping Track of the Electrons.Accounts of chemical research · 2018
    Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sharon Hammes-SchifferDepartment of Chemistry, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign , Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3782-6995

Funding

Simulation of Proton and Hydride Transfer in EnzymesR37GM056207 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI HAMMES-SCHIFFER, SHARON · 2011 to 2020
$3.2M
SIMULATION OF PROTON AND HYDRIDE TRANSFER IN ENZYMESR01GM056207 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME · PI HAMMES-SCHIFFER, SHARON · 1998 to 2010
$2.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM056207NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM056207
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Theoretical design of effective catalysts, in conjunction with the identification of guiding design principles and strategies, is a Holy Grail in Chemistry. Although further progress will benefit from additional computational advances, theoretical studies have already enhanced the design of molecular electrocatalysts, photocatalysts, and enzymes.

Indexed as

Drug DesignElectrochemical TechniquesCatalysis

Identifiers

PMID28945421
PMCPMC5849427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.