ArticleJournal of biophotonics2018
In silico optimization of radioluminescence microscopy.
Article in Journal of biophotonics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cerenkov luminescence microscopy: A novel approach for high-resolution radiotracer imaging.iScience · 2025Article
- Single-cell radioluminescence microscopy with two-fold higher sensitivity using dual scintillator configuration.PloS one · 2020Article
- Development and characterization of a scintillating cell imaging dish for radioluminescence microscopy.The Analyst · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Radioluminescence microscopy (RLM) is a high-resolution method for imaging radionuclide uptake in live cells within a fluorescence microscopy environment. Although RLM currently provides sufficient spatial resolution and sensitivity for cell imaging, it has not been systematically optimized. This study seeks to optimize the parameters of the system by computational simulation using a combination of numerical models for the system's various components: Monte-Carlo simulation for radiation transport, 3D optical point-spread function for the microscope, and stochastic photosensor model for the electron multiplying charge coupled device (EMCCD) camera. The relationship between key parameters and performance metrics relevant to image quality is examined. Results show that Lu
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.