Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28944954›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of surgery2017

Multicentre cohort study to define and validate pathological assessment of response to neoadjuvant therapy in oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma.

F Noble, M A Lloyd, R Turkington, E Griffiths, M O'Donovan, J R O'Neill, S Mercer, S L Parsons, R C Fitzgerald, T J Underwood and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Prognostic relevance of lymph node regression on survival in esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Association of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI andEuropean journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology · 2023
    Article
  12. Comparison of the predictive value of pathological response at primary tumor and lymph node status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Oesophageal Cancer Multidisciplinary Team: Can Machine Learning Assist Decision-Making?Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. State-of-the-art imaging in oesophago-gastric cancer.The British journal of radiology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

F NobleCancer Sciences Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
M A LloydCancer Sciences Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
R TurkingtonCentre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
E GriffithsDepartment of Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
M O'DonovanHutchison/Medical Research Council Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
J R O'NeillDepartment of Surgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
S MercerDepartment of Surgery, Portsmouth NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK.
S L ParsonsDepartment of Surgery, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
R C FitzgeraldHutchison/Medical Research Council Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
T J UnderwoodCancer Sciences Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9455-2188
OCCAMS consortium

Funding

Cancer Research UK 20406Cancer Research UK 23924Medical Research Council G1002565
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis multicentre cohort study sought to define a robust pathological indicator of clinically meaningful response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in oesophageal adenocarcinoma.

methodsA questionnaire was distributed to 11 UK upper gastrointestinal cancer centres to determine the use of assessment of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Records of consecutive patients undergoing oesophagogastric resection at seven centres between January 2000 and December 2013 were reviewed. Pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy was assessed using the Mandard Tumour Regression Grade (TRG) and lymph node downstaging.

resultsTRG (8 of 11 centres) was the most widely used system to assess response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, but there was discordance on how it was used in practice. Of 1392 patients, 1293 had TRG assessment; data were available for clinical and pathological nodal status (cN and pN) in 981 patients, and TRG, cN and pN in 885. There was a significant difference in survival between responders (TRG 1-2; median overall survival (OS) not reached) and non-responders (TRG 3-5; median OS 2·22 (95 per cent c.i. 1·94 to 2·51) years; P < 0·001); the hazard ratio was 2·46 (95 per cent c.i. 1·22 to 4·95; P = 0·012). Among local non-responders, the presence of lymph node downstaging was associated with significantly improved OS compared with that of patients without lymph node downstaging (median OS not reached versus 1·92 (1·68 to 2·16) years; P < 0·001).

conclusionA clinically meaningful local response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy was restricted to the small minority of patients (14·8 per cent) with TRG 1-2. Among local non-responders, a subset of patients (21·3 per cent) derived benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy by lymph node downstaging and their survival mirrored that of local responders.

Indexed as

Chemotherapy, AdjuvantNeoadjuvant TherapyAdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCisplatinCohort StudiesEpirubicinEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleFluorouracilHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesCisplatinEpirubicinFluorouracil

Identifiers

PMID28944954
PMCPMC5725679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.